|
|
|
|
|
This image has been retired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
2881 |
| Average Score |
7.52 |
| Verdict |
Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=65 |
|
| Comments: 29 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 08-18-2001
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
No Description |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #22 |
3-11-2002 @ 06:42:35 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Taurus SHOs are fast. But Ford's factory hot rods are almost totally separate cars from the ones they're based on (examples: Thunderbird SC, SVT Contour, '64 Thunderbolt) so this one has no claim to speed OR coolness.
|
|
| #23 |
3-17-2002 @ 07:54:05 PM |
| Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
im not much of a ford guy. but i know of all of ford's mistakes. (the edsel. the pinto. the mustang. the explorer. etc.). but i don't re-call ford ever releaseing a Taurus with stripes and a double R stickers.
|
|
| #24 |
3-26-2002 @ 09:13:18 PM |
| Posted By : deepblue69 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Thats not a Ford Taurus its a foRd tauRus Type R....I think the R's on the side of this car stand for Retard Racing
|
|
| #25 |
3-26-2002 @ 09:14:48 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
So the Mustang was a mistake? That's why GM put out their own version of it two years later? If you're saying Mustang II, you have my full agreement, though.
|
|
| #26 |
3-26-2002 @ 09:16:10 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I think he's talking bout' the pintostang, no one around here calls the original mustang a mistake and lives to tell about it
|
|
| #27 |
3-26-2002 @ 09:17:13 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I certainly hope so. The Pintostang has kickass potential, if you have ambition and a good sense of humor, but it SUCKED SUCKED SUCKED SUCKED SUCKED from the factory. At least it kept the nameplate alive for a decent car to take it over, though.
|
|
| #29 |
3-26-2002 @ 09:19:53 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yep. Not as cool as the '64-'73 'Stangs, but that would be an unrealistic expectation.
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
