|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
5 |
| Average Score |
1.00 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=78677 |
|
| Comments: 11 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 06-08-2009
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
1960 Edsel Ranger |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #2 |
6-29-2012 @ 05:22:25 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#1, Actually, I think the last of them were fairly respectable from a styling standpoint, but even toning down the vertical grille couldn't save them.
|
|
| #5 |
7-01-2012 @ 01:44:12 AM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, Considering the Comet (eventually put under the Mercury marque) was developed from a stillborn idea for post 1960 Edsels, the "original" look of the 58's and 59's was probably doomed from the start, though, we can probably debate for a long time if that was due to a shift in design philosophy as a whole in that decade or a desire to quickly refresh something that didn't take and branded as hideous?
|
|
| #7 |
7-01-2012 @ 03:33:35 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, Without the quad headlights and excess trim tacked on, you can actually see what the stylists were going for there.
|
|
| #9 |
7-01-2012 @ 03:07:20 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, I've heard the "production" grille was a lot bigger than any of the ones the original designers had drawn up sketches for, out of fear that the car wouldn't get enough airflow for cooling... but I have no way of verifying that.... still a pretty radical departure.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
