Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 98682   By: DiRF   Comment: "I just figured they had been...."
Car: 98682   By: Skid   Comment: "I wasn't even aware this was a direct swap, assumi..."
Car: 98682   By: DiRF   Comment: "Taking "Pintostang" to a whole new level. ...I'm ..."
Car: 63801   By: Skid   Comment: "It's a pretty great casting, really. I do enjoy di..."
Car: 63801   By: DiRF   Comment: "Well, apparently, Astros were popular/well-known e..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 348
Average Score 2.84
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=8064
Submitted by: TinIndian
Comments: 18  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 1  (View)
Submitted on: 07-18-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
'69 Firebird 400. Rice-killer extrordinaire.


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
7-18-2002 @ 05:45:00 PM
Posted By : Jesuz Reply | Edit | Del
69 is so ugly, 67 68 are way nicer

#2
7-18-2002 @ 05:46:27 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
'69 looked way better than '67 and '68. They were the least-best looking F-bodies.

#3
7-18-2002 @ 05:46:55 PM
Posted By : Jesuz Reply | Edit | Del
this car is but ugly

#4
7-18-2002 @ 05:47:03 PM
Posted By : Jesuz Reply | Edit | Del
butt ugly*

#5
7-18-2002 @ 05:47:06 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
But it's retro ugly, like an Edsel, a good ugly, unlike modern stuff

#6
7-18-2002 @ 05:47:48 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
How could anyone think this is ugly?

#7
7-18-2002 @ 05:48:50 PM
Posted By : Jesuz Reply | Edit | Del
with the head lights stay inside the ram air looks way nicer


#8
7-18-2002 @ 05:50:55 PM
Posted By : Jesuz Reply | Edit | Del
this is way nicer

http://firstgenfirebird.org/show/graphics/cars/15a.jpg


#9
7-18-2002 @ 05:53:35 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Bah. Looks like the front end has been hit from either side.

#10
7-18-2002 @ 05:56:54 PM
Posted By : rogue Reply | Edit | Del
one word : NICE!!!


#11
7-18-2002 @ 05:59:19 PM
Posted By : Jesuz Reply | Edit | Del
off topic , but just a though

evolution of muscle car

65-big and weak
66-there is muscle cars?
67-clean looking car
68-clean just got cleaner
69-holy motha.....
70-start making cars for 45 year olds
71-ammm...ok
72-damn butt ugly family cars


#12
7-18-2002 @ 06:08:00 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
To expand on this...

1964 and earlier - Performance packages on A-typical sedans
1965 - Performance packages become separate model
1966 - Street Hemi released, many major models introduced
1967 - Street racing and youthful flash introduced in advertising
1968 - Musclecars become sports coupes instead of sedans
1969 - Stronger emphasis on handling
1970 - 454 introduced, height of musclecar era.
1971 - Severe power downgrades, last year for Hemi.
1972 - Last year for Mopar big blocks
1973 - Musclecars reach lowest power point
1974 and after - Power changes from Gross to NET, so cars appear to be even weaker than they had become


#13
7-18-2002 @ 06:20:09 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Other factors not mentioned, by 1970 insurance companies began demanding upwards of $200 a year to insure muscle cars, even if you were a clean driver, from 72 on, federal regulators inserted all kinds of power-sapping regulations for emissions, as well as mandating 5mph crash bumpers and other features that tacked on to production costs and ruined the looks, plus the fuel crisis, it was just too many blows to shake off in too short a time

#14
7-18-2002 @ 07:18:09 PM
Posted By : TinIndian Reply | Edit | Del
Wait, Jesuz, '65-big and weak? My Tempest might have some size to it, but she weighs in at 3030lbs and weak is far from anybody's mind when I do a smoke show.

#15
9-12-2002 @ 11:20:04 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
this one seems to need a password for me too. suck.

#16
10-17-2002 @ 08:51:45 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
The more I look at this car, the more I like it. It's one of the nicest looking F-bodies I think I've ever seen.

#17
3-10-2004 @ 01:54:18 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
#12, I'll agree with that one

[Edited by Adambomb on 3-10-2004 @ 01:55:43 PM]


#18
3-10-2004 @ 01:58:01 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
we need to go back to 1970 when just about every car had a muscle version of it

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Sunday, May 12, 2024 11:48:48 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.