Go to car

Latest Comments
Car: 59267   By: DiRF   Comment: ":( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQdAwuZXAWc..."
Car: 92678   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "The Nissan NV200s in our work fleet haven't had me..."
Car: 92678   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "The stumbling block with work vans, for me, is bra..."
Car: Fpost   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "I wish I lived in a country where the leader can s..."
Car: 97120   By: Skid   Comment: "Roughly one inch too much diameter on those wheels..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Bling Bling
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images


Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List




Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password

View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.

Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=81551
Submitted by: DiRF
Comments: 9  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 05-05-2010
View Stats Category: Vehicle Group
Ye olde Suburban assembly line.


Showing page: 1 of 1
1 ]

5-05-2010 @ 06:57:11 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
Looks like someone used the wrong parts :P

5-05-2010 @ 07:44:34 PM
Posted By : anti honda Reply | Edit | Del
this is an improvement over whats behind it, GM should make it as the 2011 Suburban

5-05-2010 @ 08:45:35 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del

5-05-2010 @ 09:12:45 PM
Posted By : 95T-Bird Reply | Edit | Del
There's a reason why GM got in trouble, this isn't it.

5-05-2010 @ 09:26:06 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
I'm sorry, but a 1935 Chevrolet, by today's vehicle standards, is a horrible car.

Yes, as a collectible, nostalgic, classic vehicle, it's glorious, but don't try to pretend that it's a more capable or refined vehicle than what's on the market today.

5-05-2010 @ 09:34:56 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
Man, GM is really having trouble moving the old models this year.

5-05-2010 @ 09:35:08 PM
Posted By : 95T-Bird Reply | Edit | Del
You are completely correct but it was a car for its time all too many of the cars GM makes now just don't fit into today's world, GM is for the most part still stuck in 1995.

5-05-2010 @ 09:40:48 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#7, In 2002, GM was stuck in 1995. Ever since Bob Lutz came in and kicked out all the bean-counters, insisted on improved materials, interiors, and closer build-tolerances for assembly, along with encouraging creation of exciting halo-vehicles, GM has made real strides to improve itself.

It's still not at the top of the competitiveness pyramid, but I'd say it's only, at most, 2 or 3 years behind.

5-05-2010 @ 10:08:40 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
I wouldn't necessarily call a 1935 Chevrolet a horrible car by modern standards, just inappropriate for practical modern usage. In terms of operation it's the equivalent of say, a Kawasaki Gator.

Showing page: 1 of 1
1 ]

Login to leave a comment

Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 12:31:46 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2018 Ricecop. All rights reserved.