Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 97661   By: Skid   Comment: "They're not the worst, but there are quite a few w..."
Car: 97661   By: DiRF   Comment: "They're like polished, oversized versions of what ..."
Car: 97661   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "those wheels are awful, especially on here...."
Car: 33317   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Before the Ineos Grenadier, there was this. I reme..."
Car: 97492   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "To be fair, I never understood the hate. Every per..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


This image has been retired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 833
Average Score 3.07
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=933
Submitted by: Jesuz
Comments: 12  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 02-10-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
kowalski


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
2-10-2002 @ 01:38:55 PM
Posted By : Jesuz Reply | Edit | Del
4.5!! WTF
F U all ricers


#2
2-10-2002 @ 06:03:33 PM
Posted By : Geist02mds Reply | Edit | Del
3.33 now. Don't worry the real car guys will help you out.

#3
7-18-2002 @ 12:06:32 AM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
3.20, 600 votes, and it can't get into the top 10 non rice because of, a stock Cavalier? Odd world

#4
7-18-2002 @ 12:08:57 AM
Posted By : Jesuz Reply | Edit | Del
i love this car

#5
9-05-2002 @ 10:22:08 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
It just so happens that this car is a '73 or a '74 model Challenger cloned to look like a '70. Probably cheaper than buying a real '70.

#6
11-30-2002 @ 03:12:28 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#5, I think the front clip was the only thing they really changed on these cars in their brief 4 or 5 year model run

#7
11-30-2002 @ 03:14:24 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#6, And the taillights. Of course, there were also interior and powertrain changes, but that's not too hard to fix.

#8
11-30-2002 @ 03:17:04 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
And for a moive stunt car, who's going to check the engine and interior for a match? Only guys like us would notice the discrepancy, and the 70's had the big, unrestricted, unsmogged engines, so that's natrualy the one you'd want to clone

#9
11-30-2002 @ 03:18:40 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#8, This isn't a movie stunt car, though. It's a picture of someone's personal car that "Car Stars of Film and Television" used as an example of the Vanishing Point car before they got a pic of it.

#10
11-30-2002 @ 03:19:07 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#9, *open mouth, insert foot*

#11
11-30-2002 @ 03:20:14 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
I wish they cloned later models for stunts. Better yet, I wish they'd just put fake bodies on Tempos or something for stunts.

#12
12-19-2002 @ 10:30:58 AM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
#3, Yeah, that sucks...

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, November 21, 2024 10:06:10 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.