Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 71102   By: DiRF   Comment: "Huh, so, apparently, the "121" name was utilized f..."
Car: 98913   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Also, the stats don't seem that bad. 2.0T and a DC..."
Car: 98913   By: DiRF   Comment: "I don't imagine a Peugeot model of equivalent size..."
Car: 98913   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Dumb question, but why not use a Peugeot or someth..."
Car: 94524   By: DiRF   Comment: "Looks to be of similar vintage to the 1960 one tha..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

2 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 381
Average Score 2.74
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=9384
Submitted by: MoPaRHead
Comments: 10  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 1  (View)
Submitted on: 08-13-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
58' Dodge. Kinda Looks like a 58' Plymouth Fury like "Christine"


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
8-13-2002 @ 09:27:48 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Nice car. I like the '59s better, even though they have way too much chrome.

#2
8-14-2002 @ 05:34:38 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Dodge's of the late 50's weren't pretty, I admit, but they're still a helluva lot better than what BMW, Toyota, Lexus, and Cadillac are producing right now...

#3
8-14-2002 @ 05:34:58 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Amen.

#4
8-14-2002 @ 05:35:56 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Where did it all go wrong? I mean, if all of us can get together here, and admittedly, we all have different tastes in styling/cars/manufacturers, yet we can agree the current styling is horrid, so where did they screw up? and why is EVERYONE screwing up?

#5
8-14-2002 @ 05:36:40 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
I dunno. Ford haters can blame the GT90 concept for introducing that whole "edge" styling scheme..

#6
8-14-2002 @ 05:36:50 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Who knows Low-Tech...the industry is run by the same dumbasses who think the "Fast and Furious" crowd is a viable consumer market...

#7
8-14-2002 @ 05:38:18 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
It is a market, I don't fault them for trying to tap it with idiodic "looks fast" packages, I want to know when cars in general from Caddys to Civcs suddenly went to pot, I know there isn't a real answer, I'm just incredibly frustrated, that's all

#8
9-06-2002 @ 02:49:07 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
I blame the current "black plastic" trend on the Isuzu VehiCross. The edgy thing: Yeah, probably that bastardized GT90.

#9
12-06-2002 @ 01:23:40 AM
Posted By : torino500 Reply | Edit | Del
That Mopar = teh good.

#10
2-02-2004 @ 06:51:29 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
#8, I blame the commies

nice car btw


Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Sunday, May 4, 2025 09:36:55 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2025 Ricecop. All rights reserved.