|
|
|
|
|
This image has been retired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
802 |
| Average Score |
3.12 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=978 |
|
| Comments: 24 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-11-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Engine
383 ci stroker motor; 4.030 bore x 3.75 stroke; 5.7 rods (factory) polished beams; 2491 TRW forged
pistons w/ custom lightening; SCAT crank; Trickflow Twisted Wedge heads w/ polished chambers 64cc;
true decked block to 0.0, torque plate honed bores, line bored mains; Comp cam 280H; Edelbrock
Performer RPM intake; Proform HEI w/ Jacobs plug wires; Doug Thorley Tri Y headers w/ Flowmasters;
H |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #23 |
9-05-2002 @ 11:44:25 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I wouldn't say the handling on the 2nd gens was bad, but it's not spectacular, from experience, the cars seem to tend towards understeer, but just barely, they seem to corner very well, but are nose-heavy, will bottom out if tires and shocks wear, and braking is less-than-terriffic, especialy considering they pre-date ABS
|
|
| #24 |
2-23-2005 @ 01:51:23 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#19, "Really, they handled good FOR THEIR DAY"
Well of course for their day....you wouldn't expect a 1969 car to have a contemporary four-link and panhard bar. But that admission lends nothing to blanket statements like "these cars handled poorly" or "musclecars are only good in a straight line".
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
