Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 20705   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "DJ KHALED!..."
Car: 97661   By: Skid   Comment: "They're not the worst, but there are quite a few w..."
Car: 97661   By: DiRF   Comment: "They're like polished, oversized versions of what ..."
Car: 97661   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "those wheels are awful, especially on here...."
Car: 33317   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Before the Ineos Grenadier, there was this. I reme..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 18
Average Score 7.33
Verdict Bad



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=11059
Submitted by: Jurrell
Comments: 42  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 09-14-2002
View Stats Category: Photoshop/Art
Photoshop of: 7885
Description:
Lemming is really a ricer after all, shame on you!


   Comments

Showing page: 2 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]

#21
2-08-2003 @ 09:23:44 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#20, Reasonably common on 5.0s, actually.

#22
2-08-2003 @ 09:26:10 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
there was a twin turbo kit that I've heard about for the 4.6 that you can't spot from just looking at the engine (supposedly)

#23
2-08-2003 @ 09:28:06 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
I've seen a few twin turbo 5.0s (@ 5.0s vs The World) they involve MASSIVE infusions of cash to be any good, but are generally extremely impressive.

#24
2-08-2003 @ 09:28:36 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
#22, yeah and altimas are slow

#25
2-08-2003 @ 09:30:35 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#23, I saw one attempt at one on our forums 18456. Guess those weren't forged internals.

#26
2-08-2003 @ 09:34:19 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
5.0s are strong, but you need to reinforce them. I will admit to putting damn near $5k into the internals of my old Capri.

#27
2-08-2003 @ 09:35:47 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#26, What exactly had been done to that one? We've heard about the Eclipse and the CRX, and I remember that you said you used the Capri at the dragstrip, but you never said exactly what it was (well, not that I know of).

#28
2-08-2003 @ 09:37:52 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
Ok, I'll give you a history of it.

#29
2-08-2003 @ 09:39:42 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#28, Cool.

#30
2-08-2003 @ 09:41:06 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
it'll be rather lengthly, but here goes.

#31
2-08-2003 @ 09:46:30 PM
Posted By : AutobahnRacer Reply | Edit | Del
I dare lemming to do this

#32
2-08-2003 @ 09:48:00 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#31, Nah, the Dodge Stealth and Mitsu 3000GT looked better with the pop-up headlights :-P

#33
2-08-2003 @ 09:49:39 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
very lenghty it would seem
CRXtrackguy (Last active 7 minutes ago)


#34
2-08-2003 @ 09:51:22 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
CRX's 1988 Mercury Capri

It was born with a 4cylinder and an automatic. I was looking for a project car around early '95 and was attracted to the 5.0. I got the Capri for a minimum investment. I bought a R302 4-bolt main block and began what turned into the most lengthly engine build I have ever done. I knew I was going to end up looking at a level of power most would term insane, so I got really serious with the internals, although the initial build wasn't looking at a whole lot of power. I ended up with an internally balanced Scat forged crankshaft, Speedpro rings, CP Racing low-compression slugs, and Scat H-beam rods (which I believe were rated for something around 750hp) With Twisted Wedge aluminum heads, a rather complicated mix of valvtrain componentry, and a cam that was realistically too much for the motor, it ran. Despite running lower than stock compression, it still put something around 250-260hp to the rear wheels... (con't)


#35
2-08-2003 @ 09:53:33 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#34, Pretty decent output for an NA 302, considering what they were rated at from the factory

#36
2-08-2003 @ 09:59:12 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
#35, http://home.nyc.rr.com/natedogs/lol.jpg

#37
2-08-2003 @ 10:00:33 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
...which was probably more due to the rev capabilities of the valvetrain than anything else (around 7,000 RPM no problem. I've always had a thing for insane RPMS) This was my driver for nearly two months, at which point I was being challenged quite a lot at the races, and had had enough of losing. Out went the 3.73s and 255/55 R 16 michelins, and in went 4.11s and M/T ET streets on 15x10 rims. Then I dove under the hood and didn't come out until about $5k later. In went a weiand blower, set up for roughly 11psi of boost. At the same time in went a Holley nitrous system, with jetting for around 150hp. (This was back before it was called NAAWSS, mind you) Add a rollcage, a 5" cowl hood, a mini-tub kit, a C-clip eliminator kit for the 8.8, a total new gearset for the T5, and a McLeod single-disc clutch. Easy 10.8. Learn about icing the intake manifold, etc, etc, and you're running a consistent 10.2, with occasional dips into the 9s. And that was my Capri.

#38
2-08-2003 @ 10:01:33 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
It was a beast, but not a great daily driver.

#39
2-08-2003 @ 10:02:41 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#37, Holy crap.

#40
2-08-2003 @ 10:03:13 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
I don't fuck around when I modify my cars.

Showing page: 2 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Saturday, November 23, 2024 05:24:45 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.