Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 95884   By: Skid   Comment: "Someone released Mulholland Drive as a track....11..."
Car: 98674   By: Skid   Comment: "Given the very low point Trans Ams performance was..."
Car: 98675   By: Skid   Comment: "I'm forever on the hunt for the XK140 dropheads th..."
Car: 98673   By: Skid   Comment: "Now THAT is a cool find. I love the British Fords..."
Car: 43287   By: Skid   Comment: "Whoo boy, there's a memory......"
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

2 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 143
Average Score 3.78
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=15523
Submitted by: Adambomb
Comments: 9  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 12-03-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Sleeper?


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
12-03-2002 @ 11:28:01 PM
Posted By : speedkills Reply | Edit | Del
yeah, looks like it's been sleeping for a while...

#2
12-03-2002 @ 11:34:09 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
*Sleeping*

#3
12-03-2002 @ 11:40:02 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Capri? and it's not going anywhere with the driveshaft on the ground like that......

#4
12-03-2002 @ 11:54:23 PM
Posted By : CommieChris Reply | Edit | Del
I'm sure a ricer would call it a "weight reduction."

#5
12-03-2002 @ 11:56:02 PM
Posted By : speedkills Reply | Edit | Del
just cut a hole in the floorboard...then you got the m@d tYt3 Fred Flintstone mod...

#6
12-04-2002 @ 04:18:17 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#3, not, just a very early Fox-Body

#7
1-19-2003 @ 05:20:22 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#6, I thought it was your place for a minute.

#8
2-04-2003 @ 01:24:05 PM
Posted By : p34ch0r Reply | Edit | Del
#4, Well, having the rear wheels as the drive wheels is SOO low-tech. And since a transaxle costs so much, simply dropping the d-shaft is the most effective way to get faster 1/4 times, ya see?

#9
2-12-2003 @ 09:41:17 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
This is a good sleeper candidate.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, April 19, 2024 11:21:00 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.