Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 87847   By: DiRF   Comment: "Not the prettiest belle at the ball... the rear qu..."
Car: 91522   By: Adambomb   Comment: "This brings back memories of warmer times...."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "http://www.hotrod.com/articles/1933-continental-co..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Oddly appropriate, being surrounded by other Korea..."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "One of these too http://row52.com/Vehicle/Index/KL..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


This image has been retired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 714
Average Score 3.74
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=1563
Submitted by: DiRF
Comments: 25  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 03-03-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Here is the production version of the 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. It uses a Mercedes-Benz
3.2L V6 and RWD set-up. The rear-end is also much nicer than the


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#1
3-03-2002 @ 11:10:04 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Here is the production version of the 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. It uses a Mercedes-Benz
3.2L V6 and RWD set-up. The rear-end is also much nicer than the "concept car" version of this car. And in case you're still wondering, Yes, this car IS going into production.


#2
3-04-2002 @ 12:01:59 AM
Posted By : Jiffy Reply | Edit | Del
cool. kind reminds me of a radical audi tt though...

[Edited by Jiffy on 3-04-2002 @ 12:05:10 AM]


#3
3-04-2002 @ 12:04:47 AM
Posted By : nachobitch Reply | Edit | Del
Yeah, looks like a mix between a TT and a PT Cruiser. Especially the grill.

#4
3-06-2002 @ 10:29:44 PM
Posted By : Geist02mds Reply | Edit | Del
S2000 going down, thanks once again to the Mopar.

#5
3-12-2002 @ 04:27:19 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!!!!!!!!!!

#6
3-12-2002 @ 04:29:32 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Woah, settle down there kiddo... Ah what the hell, I like this car too....

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


#7
3-12-2002 @ 04:29:59 PM
Posted By : Mindspynn Reply | Edit | Del
MOPAR, MOPAR, MOPAR!!!!!!!! YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!

#8
3-14-2002 @ 12:56:29 AM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Not bad at all. What kind of horsepower does it have? And how much will it cost? Is this gonna be as good a deal as the Razor?

#9
3-14-2002 @ 09:56:17 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
It's gonna be about $30-35K. Remember, it has a Mercedes drivetrain, that's the reason for the high price.

#10
8-29-2002 @ 03:24:31 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
Look! It's coming! http://www.commondriver.com/e03crcros0106.asp

#11
8-29-2002 @ 03:26:57 PM
Posted By : comradesampo Reply | Edit | Del
A rear-wheel-drive Chrysler? I must be dreaming.

#12
8-29-2002 @ 03:31:36 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
I just hope they see a RWD car with the new Hemi soon. Supposedly, they are going to make a 2 door Charger, but it's not been confirmed.

PLEASE, Chrysler, make luxury equipment optional. I want a low base price on an all-business car.


#13
8-29-2002 @ 03:38:46 PM
Posted By : comradesampo Reply | Edit | Del
If they put the Charger name on anything other than a rear-drive two-door V8 someone's getting a bomb in the mail.

#14
8-29-2002 @ 03:40:22 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
#12, Sorry Skid, I wouldn't count on it...the engine, transmission, chassis, brakes, and electronics are all Mercedes Benz.

#15
8-29-2002 @ 03:41:28 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
$34,000 and only 215hp/229tq

#16
8-29-2002 @ 03:41:46 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
I'm not talking about in this car, I'm talking about with the new Charger. I'm just saying if they're offering a rear wheel drive car again, maybe things are starting to look up.

#17
8-29-2002 @ 03:43:15 PM
Posted By : comradesampo Reply | Edit | Del
#15: Chrysler is more a luxury brand than a performance brand, isn't it?

#18
8-29-2002 @ 03:46:17 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
Yup...and Mercedes is just starting to make components of the Chrysler cars now even though they originally said they wouldn't because they thought the Chysler name "would tarnish the Mercedes reputation".

#19
8-29-2002 @ 03:47:28 PM
Posted By : comradesampo Reply | Edit | Del
Then why they'd buy it?

#20
8-29-2002 @ 03:49:44 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
What a lot of people overlook is that prior to the merger, Mercedes wasn't in much better shape than Chrysler, financial or quality-wise.

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Sunday, December 17, 2017 12:53:31 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Ricecop. All rights reserved.