Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 91078   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Update: car is now derelict in North Minneapolis o..."
Car: 93248   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Now riding on very large 5 spokes, lifted and cut ..."
Car: 92158   By: Adambomb   Comment: "Escort is powah..."
Car: 92597   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "This is likely the only one of these I have ever s..."
Car: 91779   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "I love how these cars look, but I would hate to ow..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 233
Average Score 6.87
Verdict Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=16758
Submitted by: kstagger
Comments: 30  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 01-01-2003
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
a gold supra


   Comments

Showing page: 2 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#21
11-21-2003 @ 01:00:09 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#20, I thought Supras were I6's?

#22
11-21-2003 @ 01:00:18 PM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#20, Four cylinder?

#23
11-21-2003 @ 01:02:00 PM
Posted By : Kakoriat Reply | Edit | Del
#21, They are from the factory, this Supra has a 3M-STE thrown into it. It's the same engine used for the JGTC Supra's. It's a 2.2liter 4 banger making about 700hp.

#24
11-21-2003 @ 01:02:53 PM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#23, Why downgrade tho?

#25
11-21-2003 @ 01:05:49 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#24, Well, going up to 700 HP isn't really a downgrade............

#26
11-21-2003 @ 01:05:54 PM
Posted By : Kakoriat Reply | Edit | Del
#24, Certain rules for the JGTC probably limit the engine size for that class. I'm no expert at the subject but a couple reasons could be the 4-cyc weights less, probably makes a better weight distribution, and maybe they wanted to make something different. Maybe there is a reason the company is called "Top Secret"?

#27
11-21-2003 @ 01:07:09 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#26, If it's engine rules, then it's probably displacment, they usualy divide up car classes by total car weight, or engine size as in displacment.

#28
11-21-2003 @ 01:07:43 PM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#25, I dunno, Id think you could push a little more power out of a 6 than a 4...

#26, I know absolutely nothing about JGTC, so.. ok.


#29
11-21-2003 @ 01:10:53 PM
Posted By : Kakoriat Reply | Edit | Del
#27, Yeah, that sounds about right.

To futher the point that they probably put these engines in to balance weight, take a look at how far back this little thing sits. http://www.superstreetonline.com/su...image_large.jpg


#30
3-21-2004 @ 02:18:10 AM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#29, Talk about weight distribution... I approve.

Showing page: 2 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Tuesday, May 27, 2025 08:19:12 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2025 Ricecop. All rights reserved.