Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 97661   By: Skid   Comment: "They're not the worst, but there are quite a few w..."
Car: 97661   By: DiRF   Comment: "They're like polished, oversized versions of what ..."
Car: 97661   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "those wheels are awful, especially on here...."
Car: 33317   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Before the Ineos Grenadier, there was this. I reme..."
Car: 97492   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "To be fair, I never understood the hate. Every per..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 233
Average Score 6.87
Verdict Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=16758
Submitted by: kstagger
Comments: 30  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 01-01-2003
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
a gold supra


   Comments

Showing page: 2 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#21
11-21-2003 @ 01:00:09 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#20, I thought Supras were I6's?

#22
11-21-2003 @ 01:00:18 PM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#20, Four cylinder?

#23
11-21-2003 @ 01:02:00 PM
Posted By : Kakoriat Reply | Edit | Del
#21, They are from the factory, this Supra has a 3M-STE thrown into it. It's the same engine used for the JGTC Supra's. It's a 2.2liter 4 banger making about 700hp.

#24
11-21-2003 @ 01:02:53 PM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#23, Why downgrade tho?

#25
11-21-2003 @ 01:05:49 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#24, Well, going up to 700 HP isn't really a downgrade............

#26
11-21-2003 @ 01:05:54 PM
Posted By : Kakoriat Reply | Edit | Del
#24, Certain rules for the JGTC probably limit the engine size for that class. I'm no expert at the subject but a couple reasons could be the 4-cyc weights less, probably makes a better weight distribution, and maybe they wanted to make something different. Maybe there is a reason the company is called "Top Secret"?

#27
11-21-2003 @ 01:07:09 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#26, If it's engine rules, then it's probably displacment, they usualy divide up car classes by total car weight, or engine size as in displacment.

#28
11-21-2003 @ 01:07:43 PM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#25, I dunno, Id think you could push a little more power out of a 6 than a 4...

#26, I know absolutely nothing about JGTC, so.. ok.


#29
11-21-2003 @ 01:10:53 PM
Posted By : Kakoriat Reply | Edit | Del
#27, Yeah, that sounds about right.

To futher the point that they probably put these engines in to balance weight, take a look at how far back this little thing sits. http://www.superstreetonline.com/su...image_large.jpg


#30
3-21-2004 @ 02:18:10 AM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#29, Talk about weight distribution... I approve.

Showing page: 2 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, November 22, 2024 09:00:12 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.