|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
76 |
| Average Score |
3.53 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=18739 |
|
| Comments: 84 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-11-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
Photoshops of this image:
18751, 20490, 21883, |
Description:
Yet another picture of my car. I just liked this one because it looks nice and shiny. |
Showing page: 2 of 5
[ 1 2 3 4 5 ]
 |
| #21 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:11:34 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#17, Ah, come on..I get almost 20MPG and I can even spin one wheel. Yay me! :-P
|
|
| #22 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:11:52 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#20, (forgive me for this one) You never have headroom in a Mustang because you ride high in the saddle, the seat is mounted too high.
|
|
| #24 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:12:33 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#21, Wheras I get something humorously bad like 12mpg and can spin that one wheel until it falls off.
|
|
| #25 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:12:49 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#20, Works alright for me. But I've got fairly long legs, so I do have the seat pushed far enough back that the backseat is totally useless. If I could figure out a way to rip it out entirely (and not make a mess) I would.
|
|
| #28 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:13:53 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#23, Yeah, I think snake's main complaint was about the door panels cutting into driver leg room.
|
|
| #29 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:14:37 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#25, i dont know about the back, but the bottom pops right off
|
|
| #31 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:15:12 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Only one I've ever driven I kept hitting my head on the roof unless I leaned the seat way back, PLUS (ultimate suckage) the brake pedal was too far away for proper heel-toe work. HOW IS A MAN SUPPOSED TO DRIVE IF HE CANNOT HEEL-TOE!
|
|
| #33 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:15:48 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#29, The back on mine folds down. Actually getting rid of the rear seat (and not having it look a mess) would probably be fairly involved.
|
|
| #35 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:17:00 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#31, You can shim the gas pedal up a little so it only sits 1/2 inch below the brake (I've done that). My main complaint is that the gas pedal is so low, but the clutch is so freaking high. It's a bit of a contortion.
|
|
| #36 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:17:18 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Car and Driver says they're still fox-bodies. They crack jokes about "chassis designed in 1979." I don't think so, but I haven't had time to get a tape measure out to the chassis of 'em. They _could_ be right.
|
|
| #37 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:18:34 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
regarding comment #31. I'm the only guy I've ever met that heel-toes when stopping for traffic lights. It's just habit.
|
|
| #38 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:19:01 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The brake in the Brick is too close to the gas. I had a pair of big hiking boots when I bought it and I seriously couldn't drive it wearing those: Anytime I tried to hit the gas I pushed the brake down too.
|
|
| #39 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:19:16 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#33, nah, once you get it out, just find some carpet that matches yours and cover some plywood and bolt/screw it on
|
|
| #40 |
2-11-2003 @ 08:19:37 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#36, Although the newer Stangs are obviously derived in some ways from their Fox-based predecessors, I'm not sure I'd say it's the same chassis. However, I've never driven an older Mustang, so I cannot say for sure.
|
Showing page: 2 of 5
[ 1 2 3 4 5 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
