|
|
|
|
|
This image has been retired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
716 |
| Average Score |
6.29 |
| Verdict |
Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=2074 |
|
| Comments: 203 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 03-17-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
This is my car. Say what you will. No, I don't think it is the fastest thing on four
wheels, its actually pretty slow. Yes, I do like domestics (just not new ones. Old School
Muscle is good though). Now all the hate-mailers cant say that we all drive an SS! |
Showing page: 10 of 11
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ]
 |
| #181 |
8-17-2002 @ 10:55:56 AM |
| Posted By : NOSsucks |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Im putting in an SiR engine. 170HP DOHC V-Tec with about 155 Ft/lb of torque. The engine wasnt even available in the US. Mods are gonna include: Cold air intake, Headers, Racing Cat, Cat-Back exhaust, stronger internals, new cams, cam gears, underdrive pulleys, and hopefully a decent turbo. Hope to have everything done in about a year.
|
|
| #182 |
8-17-2002 @ 10:57:01 AM |
| Posted By : NOSsucks |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#180 :) I know, hehe. Im having fun. Hell, Im getting paid right now. For sitting here, posting on ricecop...
|
|
| #183 |
8-17-2002 @ 10:57:47 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
how the hell did a honda sir engine get that much torque? is it a 1.8?
|
|
| #184 |
8-17-2002 @ 10:57:59 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#179 I dont know if you have another name for it, but basically it extracts the exausts from the engine better. Hence the name extractors.
|
|
| #185 |
8-17-2002 @ 10:59:09 AM |
| Posted By : NOSsucks |
Reply | Edit | Del |
1.6 liter. Its the engine out of the Civic Type-R. Its basically a more solid SI engine. Stronger factory internals.
|
|
| #186 |
8-17-2002 @ 10:59:26 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
you mean exhaust system ? :)
[Edited by ambientFLIER on 8-17-2002 @ 11:00:25 AM]
|
|
| #187 |
8-17-2002 @ 11:00:09 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
you gotta show me a spec sheet for that engine...150lbft with 170hp sounds way too far-fetched for me
|
|
| #188 |
8-17-2002 @ 11:00:41 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#186 if you like, but not really. But they are meant to add about 20-50hp depending on the engine etc.
|
|
| #189 |
8-17-2002 @ 11:00:59 AM |
| Posted By : NOSsucks |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Im hoping to have about 300ish Horsepower after Im done with it. Im gonna try and go for a balanced car that can do Autocross, but still fair well on the strip. Im gonna beef the suspension up too.
|
|
| #190 |
8-17-2002 @ 11:02:02 AM |
| Posted By : NOSsucks |
Reply | Edit | Del |
K, Ill see if I can find one. Im fairly sure it was 150ish. But not positive. So dont hold it against me if Im wrong :)
|
|
| #194 |
8-17-2002 @ 11:04:33 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#191 5mins time on the computer an S2000 gets 50 more hp.
|
|
| #195 |
8-17-2002 @ 11:05:23 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
btw, this pic couldn't have been worse quality if it was taken with a vintage polaroid monkey camera
[Edited by ambientFLIER on 8-17-2002 @ 11:06:20 AM]
|
|
| #196 |
8-17-2002 @ 11:09:31 AM |
| Posted By : NOSsucks |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Well, damn, I was wrong. Not sure where the hell I got 150 ft/lb. Here are the specs.
'92-'95 CivicSiR
Japan EG
B16A 1595
10.4:1
168hp@7800RPM/116lb-ft@7300
|
|
| #198 |
8-17-2002 @ 11:10:35 AM |
| Posted By : NOSsucks |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Actually Ambient, it was taken with a schools digital camera. I couldnt find the vintage polaroid. :)
|
|
| #199 |
8-17-2002 @ 11:10:49 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Pretty good, but 116 lb-ft at that high an RPM isn't my style.
|
Showing page: 10 of 11
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
