|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=28868 |
|
| Comments: 37 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 12-08-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
Photoshops of this image:
28870, |
Description:
My baby, please be gentle :) |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #21 |
12-08-2003 @ 02:47:27 PM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#20, sweet. Good info there. Thanx.
If I did ever get a vette, it would probably be a newer one or an early to mid 90s one. I liked the comfort level on those. Plus, they already had some heat. :-)
|
|
| #23 |
12-08-2003 @ 02:53:46 PM |
| Posted By : Silverbaby |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#22, I think the newer Vettes have more room. I sat in a C5 and I would have had to have moved the seat up a lot to reach the petals, but I am only 5'6".....
|
|
| #24 |
12-08-2003 @ 02:54:10 PM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#22, They must have. Its kind of a tight fit though. Its pretty nice once I get in, but I wouldn't want it for long trips. There is very little move around room.
|
|
| #25 |
12-08-2003 @ 02:55:07 PM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#23, The C5 is really comfortable for me. The seat puts me right in the sweet spot for maximum visability and control.
|
|
| #30 |
12-08-2003 @ 04:43:20 PM |
| Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Fiero's and MR2's.
The thing is is that i like them both.
[Edited by Obsidian on 12-08-2003 @ 04:43:52 PM]
|
|
| #31 |
12-08-2003 @ 05:14:14 PM |
| Posted By : Bmarc |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#17, 240z and 260zs don't have back seats unless they are 2+2s in which they look like they were streched and throw off the lines. The 260z I'm looking at is only a 2 seater. Lots of room :)
|
|
| #32 |
12-08-2003 @ 05:53:58 PM |
| Posted By : SacrifRICE |
Reply | Edit | Del |
To answer an earlier question, the first-gen MR2s, such as this one here, came with an optional supercharger, the second generation (the curved body style) came with optional turbochargers. I'd still prefer the super-lightweight path and get a first-gen non-turbo and lose as much weight as possible, then maybe make some cam/piston adjustments. That would be sweeeet....
|
|
| #33 |
12-08-2003 @ 08:02:23 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#1, I'm nearly 6 foot and have plenty of headroom.
[Edited by thirtyseven on 12-08-2003 @ 08:03:17 PM]
|
|
| #34 |
12-08-2003 @ 08:06:47 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#32, Like mine, I have a TRD header, magnex cat delete exhaust (imported from england) TRD high lift cams and sprockets, custom intake with K&N conical air filter and a few other tasty mods... Trust me, 140 HP doesn't sound much but when you weigh around a ton, it is.
|
|
| #35 |
5-13-2005 @ 08:42:26 AM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Im going to have to rice this out in photoshop sometime... ;)
|
|
| #36 |
5-13-2005 @ 08:44:56 AM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#35, Yeah? I'd like to see that, actually. "What Thirtyseven would do to his car if he were 16".
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
