Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 20705   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "DJ KHALED!..."
Car: 97661   By: Skid   Comment: "They're not the worst, but there are quite a few w..."
Car: 97661   By: DiRF   Comment: "They're like polished, oversized versions of what ..."
Car: 97661   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "those wheels are awful, especially on here...."
Car: 33317   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Before the Ineos Grenadier, there was this. I reme..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 108
Average Score 5.65
Verdict Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=29851
Submitted by: orbhot
Comments: 15  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 01-27-2004
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Jaguar X-type with ricer wing.


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
1-27-2004 @ 10:09:11 AM
Posted By : blackcat77 Reply | Edit | Del
It's a race car -- it comes by it's wing honestly.

#2
1-27-2004 @ 10:19:26 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
nice car

#3
1-27-2004 @ 10:54:41 AM
Posted By : RyCe_MuNkIe Reply | Edit | Del
it could really do w/o the wing

#4
1-27-2004 @ 10:55:09 AM
Posted By : SacrifRICE Reply | Edit | Del
Pardon me if I'm wrong...and I very well may be...but I usually figured that simply bolting a wing that looks like the kind you buy at Pep Boys to the flexible and movable trunklid isn't a very sound idea. While the rest of the car looks like it was built by professionals, that wing just doesn't seem to match up. The wing is certainly wide enough to be bolted on to the unit-body structure of the car on either side of the trunklid, I suppose, but, oh well. Doesn't a wing necessitate a rigid mounting?

#5
1-27-2004 @ 01:09:35 PM
Posted By : orbhot Reply | Edit | Del
#4, It is a nice car for a Ford, but the aluminum bolt-on wing kills it. At least with all that downforce the trunk lid will stay closed while it's racing. ;-)

#6
1-27-2004 @ 06:26:54 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
I visited my wife's aunt in Mexico the other day, and she drive a 2003 Ford Mondeo, which happens to be the car this fake Jag is based on. I have to say, for a Ford it was quite nice, if a bit too VW like.

[Edited by thirtyseven on 1-27-2004 @ 06:27:56 PM]


#7
1-27-2004 @ 06:30:03 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#6, Oh crap, the X-type is Mondeo derived? I went looking at those with my father over winter break (he was contemplating buying a car since he was uncertain if he'd have a company car with his new job) and I made the offhand comment that the engines probably came out of the Mondeo parts bin, just based on their specs. I was almost right, then.

#8
1-27-2004 @ 06:33:10 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#7, But it's based on the SECOND gen Mondeo...

The American Mercury Cougar and the Contour/Mystique were based on the first gen Mondeo

The Jaguar X-type is on a HEAVILY modified 2nd gen Mondeo platform... Jaguar installed an AWD system with a rear-wheel bias, and they did all the suspension tuning for the X-type, not Ford.


#9
1-27-2004 @ 06:33:16 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
#7, It's a TERRIBLE thing really, For dengineered the car to be 4WD standard so as not to rape Jaguar's RWD hertiage. Than they go and make a FWD Europe only model because it's selling slowly. Because people see through the sham. Because it's crrrrap.

#10
1-27-2004 @ 06:34:30 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
#8, Yes as I said, a 2003 Pass, er, Mondeo. Very VW clonish. Nice for a Ford, bad for a Jag.

#11
1-27-2004 @ 06:35:20 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
I sat in one, and I wasn't terribly impressed. Jags are supposed to be luxury cars, but the ~$30K base model doesn't include a power passenger's seat and has cheap-looking trim? WTH?

#12
1-27-2004 @ 06:39:49 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#8, I wasn't implying that I thought it was directly based off the same Mondeo that gave birth to the Contour. I'm just unimpressed by the fact that not only did they take one of Ford Europe's most commonly-used power teams and put it in a Jag, but that they used the whole darn car. :-)

#13
1-27-2004 @ 06:42:50 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
#12, Platform engineering is modern badge engineering. It will come back to haunt Ford and VW.

#14
10-14-2004 @ 05:51:45 PM
Posted By : AtEase Reply | Edit | Del
#13, Not if they do it well enough. I think it's a necessity. Developing a brand new car is very expensive.

#15
3-20-2006 @ 08:45:24 PM
Posted By : sven Reply | Edit | Del
Its not bad. The car could probably do with a different wing but it is a racecar and so it stays.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, November 22, 2024 03:48:01 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.