Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 95884   By: Skid   Comment: "Someone released Mulholland Drive as a track....11..."
Car: 98674   By: Skid   Comment: "Given the very low point Trans Ams performance was..."
Car: 98675   By: Skid   Comment: "I'm forever on the hunt for the XK140 dropheads th..."
Car: 98673   By: Skid   Comment: "Now THAT is a cool find. I love the British Fords..."
Car: 43287   By: Skid   Comment: "Whoo boy, there's a memory......"
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=36173
Submitted by: ricerocketboy
Comments: 21  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 10-17-2004
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
pic from our road trip


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#1
10-17-2004 @ 01:22:06 PM
Posted By : Muntz05 Reply | Edit | Del
Subtle rice, nothing but the ugly wing. Way better than the obnoxious body kit, stickers, vinyls, neons, altezzas, and erecter set wing.

#2
10-17-2004 @ 01:35:55 PM
Posted By : ImRaptor Reply | Edit | Del
Thats one damn big wing.

#3
10-17-2004 @ 01:36:45 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
it was fuckin huge in person. If ya think it looks bad here, it looks 1000 times worse in person

#4
3-08-2005 @ 12:14:45 PM
Posted By : Biohazard Reply | Edit | Del
#1, THe last thing I would call this is "subtle"

#5
7-11-2005 @ 01:44:25 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
Still gets a 10 from me.

#6
7-11-2005 @ 01:55:21 AM
Posted By : 89Rettagt Reply | Edit | Del
does this race at pikes peak?

#7
7-11-2005 @ 02:48:33 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
hardly a 10, since there is stuff much much worse on here...you are just defeating the point of the ratings if you give it a 10...i give it a 7

#8
7-11-2005 @ 02:49:34 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
#7, Rice is rice.

#9
7-11-2005 @ 02:51:40 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
#8, yeah, and there's degrees of rice...by giving this a 10 you are saying that it's as bad as a civic with a wing, altezzas, lambo doors, body kit, 24-inch rims, horrible paint, etc etc, which it's not...in order for the ron rating system to work well, you need to rate the cars subjectively and not give automatic 10's to cars like these

if everyone gave this a 10, it would be #1 on the ricer list, and all it has is a wing

[Edited by ambientFLIER on 7-11-2005 @ 02:53:30 AM]


#10
7-11-2005 @ 02:56:32 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
#9, Well to me putting only a wing on a civic is just as bad as adding bodykits, altezzas and paint jobs. There is no excuse for this, hence automatic 10.

#11
7-11-2005 @ 02:58:30 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
#10, bah, i'm sure if trooper was here, he would agree with me...what's the point of the ratings if every damn civic with even a single aftermarket item of bad taste is an automatic 10...the rating system might as well be either a 0 or a 10, and nothing in between

#12
7-11-2005 @ 03:01:18 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
#11, ahem, 1 or 10. That's my voting style and if you looked at the vote distribution you'll notice most of them are 10s.

#13
7-11-2005 @ 03:03:48 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
#12, well then you are just screwing up the ratings

there should be a 0, btw, 1 just doesn't make sense as in "not rice"...i asked trooped about that before, and he made the rice/not rice point at 5.5, but why he didn't move the starting point to 0, beats me


#14
7-11-2005 @ 03:06:41 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
#13, Because if there were a 0, it would look as if nobody voted and it would really defy the point of voting. Yes, even more than my 'screwing up the voting' style. Besides, I don't see any rules that state the way that I vote wrong.

#15
7-11-2005 @ 03:10:42 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
#14, there are a lot of things that aren't in the rules, but are frowned upon

[Edited by ambientFLIER on 7-11-2005 @ 03:12:27 AM]


#16
7-11-2005 @ 03:11:45 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
#15, I know but no one made you boss.

[Edited by 427 Vette on 7-11-2005 @ 03:15:24 AM]


#17
7-11-2005 @ 03:12:12 AM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
#16, what...that doesnt make any sense?!!!? :P

#18
7-11-2005 @ 03:17:28 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
#17, how?

#19
7-11-2005 @ 06:24:21 PM
Posted By : Tastycakemix Reply | Edit | Del
Nice shopping cart.

#20
7-12-2005 @ 08:00:03 AM
Posted By : Trooper  Reply | Edit | Del
I would probably give this an 8. A lot of people have the 1 or 10 voting style. Most of these ratings sites, at least hot or not, have a formula they apply to the data to "normalize" the final score to account for the 1/10 people. I never got around to figuring that out unfortunately :(

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, April 19, 2024 11:30:38 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.