Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Now do Classical Gas!..."
Car: 98681   By: DiRF   Comment: "This must have been right around 1979, when the US..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Very nice...."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "So, I pre-odered these last August and they finall..."
Car: 98680   By: Skid   Comment: "Neat! I don't know if I've ever seen one of these ..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=39181
Submitted by: stang392
Comments: 46  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 03-24-2005
View Stats Category: Vehicle Misc
Description:
My CHP 347 Street Fighter short block


   Comments

Showing page: 2 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]

#21
3-17-2006 @ 06:22:44 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
just ordered my heads, they ship monday :-)

[Edited by stang392 on 3-17-2006 @ 06:24:35 PM]


#22
3-17-2006 @ 06:38:28 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
awesome. Goin in the red notch I assume right?

#23
3-17-2006 @ 06:39:15 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
yep

#24
3-17-2006 @ 06:48:02 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
sweet.

#25
3-17-2006 @ 10:34:46 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
damn, I just figured it up and I'm sitting on $4825 worth of parts, and I'm still missing some major components

#26
3-21-2006 @ 03:39:44 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
w00t!!!
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g.../Picture289.jpg
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g.../Picture287.jpg
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g.../Picture285.jpg


#27
3-21-2006 @ 03:41:12 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#26, Sweet heads

#28
3-21-2006 @ 03:51:03 PM
Posted By : AWD Pride Reply | Edit | Del
Do they make 3-valve heads for 5.0's? I'd imagine that would help out quite a bit for higher rpm power.

[Edited by AWD Pride on 3-21-2006 @ 03:51:33 PM]


#29
3-21-2006 @ 03:57:23 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#28, they make 4-valve heads, but they are pretty much a race only part.

#30
3-21-2006 @ 03:58:27 PM
Posted By : AWD Pride Reply | Edit | Del
#29, That's pretty cool. I wonder what the gains and the power/torque curves would be for an otherwise stock 5.0 with those heads.

#31
3-21-2006 @ 03:59:55 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#28, The only 3 valve engines Ford produced around the 5.0s time were the MOD and Triton IIRC, and those were truck engines

[Edited by Subourbon187 on 3-21-2006 @ 04:00:42 PM]


#32
3-21-2006 @ 04:04:32 PM
Posted By : AWD Pride Reply | Edit | Del
#31, I didn't realize that they made 3-valve engines back in late 80's. I thought you were talking about the new 5.4-liter triton, which is a joke.

#33
3-21-2006 @ 04:06:22 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#32, Well, they started making them in 1991 (late in the 5.0s life cycle) and they replaced the Windsor small block.

[Edited by Subourbon187 on 3-21-2006 @ 04:07:31 PM]


#34
3-21-2006 @ 04:19:17 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#33, nope, the 3-vavle is a new thing for the mod motors, they started out just as 2 or 4 vavle

[Edited by stang392 on 3-21-2006 @ 04:21:32 PM]


#35
3-21-2006 @ 04:22:13 PM
Posted By : AWD Pride Reply | Edit | Del
#34, And they should have kept them as 4-valve.

#36
3-21-2006 @ 04:24:29 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#34, That's right, I get my dates mixed up sometimes, my bad

#37
3-21-2006 @ 04:27:41 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#35, they haven't done away with the 4-valve, just the 2

#38
3-21-2006 @ 04:29:57 PM
Posted By : AWD Pride Reply | Edit | Del
#37, I know, I just meant that the new 5.4 should be a 4-valve.

#39
3-21-2006 @ 04:34:42 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#38, not really, the 5.4 is a mainly a truck engine, it doesn't need to rev high, it needs to make power down low, so really they should have kept it a 2 valve for the trucks.

#40
3-21-2006 @ 04:35:38 PM
Posted By : AWD Pride Reply | Edit | Del
#39, If anything, they should have made it pushrod then.

Whatever, I'm just pissed at the new F-150's for being such fucking fatasses. Give me a ram anyday or even a chevy. At least then I would be able to haul a load and actually keep up with traffic :)

[Edited by AWD Pride on 3-21-2006 @ 04:38:08 PM]


Showing page: 2 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Monday, May 6, 2024 03:20:01 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.