|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
51 |
| Average Score |
2.73 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=41497 |
|
| Comments: 21 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 06-21-2005
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Nice Skyline. |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #3 |
6-21-2005 @ 02:25:18 AM |
| Posted By : Driven_out |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#1, GTS-T 2.5l
#2, Me too. But then again. GT-R or GTS-T, Each would be fun.
[Edited by Driven_out on 6-21-2005 @ 02:25:42 AM]
|
|
| #5 |
6-21-2005 @ 02:54:10 AM |
| Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The front bumper looks ass.
What does GTS mean? RWD only?
|
|
| #7 |
6-21-2005 @ 02:56:46 AM |
| Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, I don't understand all this AWD hype. I'd prefer an RWD. I think.
|
|
| #10 |
6-21-2005 @ 03:01:17 AM |
| Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, Yeah. Needs more GT-R front ( I can't see the rear) bumper and less wing.
|
|
| #12 |
6-21-2005 @ 03:06:06 AM |
| Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The way I see it...
The perfect handling is: a touch of understeer at corner entry (stabbilises the car), neutral handling at the apex, and a bit of oversteer at corner exit (makes for faster and safer exit).
In therory, AWD car is the way to go. But...
-too much understeer
-too much weight
-too much power lost in the drivetrain.
So... I think RWD is the way to go. Of course, I know GT-R has the funky system shifting more power to the rear wheels as speed increases (which is funny IMO. My econobox understeers less and less the higher the speed o_O)... Also, the Sierra Cosworth had a 40/60 front/rear drive distribution...
|
|
| #16 |
6-21-2005 @ 03:15:54 AM |
| Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15, Thought so :)
But as I said: the higher the speed the more neutral/oversteer handling. I whish I scored better at physics than 3 >:(
|
|
| #18 |
6-21-2005 @ 05:59:00 AM |
| Posted By : karrakka |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#17, Physics is useless? No physics -> no automotive engineering -> no cars!
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
