Ricecop's Rice Or Not?

Latest Comments

Car: 98677	By: Skid	Comment: "I think '66 is the only year I like the Caprice ro..."
Car: 37161	By: DiRF	Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161	By: DiRF	Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the only team o..."
Car: 78637	By: DiRF	Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost	By: DiRF	Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."

See last 25 comments

Go to
Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post

Top 10
Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad

New & Retired
Newest Images Retired Images

Other
Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats

Online Now
0 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List

View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.

Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=41905	Submitted by: 427 Vette
Comments: 22 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View)	Submitted on: 07-07-2005
View Stats	Category: Vehicle Group

Description: American Muscle.

Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]


#1	7-07-2005 @ 02:34:06 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I absolutely fucking love every one of these three cars. They are the products of American car companies' management pulling their collective heads out of their collective asses.


#2	7-07-2005 @ 02:57:10 PM
Posted By : stang392	Reply \| Edit \| Del
two of these need different Badges and one needs a lot less weight.


#3	7-07-2005 @ 03:04:24 PM
Posted By : 427 Vette	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I'd take a GTO in Midnight Blue. [Edited by 427 Vette on 7-07-2005 @ 03:07:23 PM]


#4	7-07-2005 @ 04:53:22 PM
Posted By : Muntz05	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Fanboys explode!!


#5	7-07-2005 @ 05:23:02 PM
Posted By : ambientFLIER	Reply \| Edit \| Del
the charger supposedly handles like crap, but i still love it


#6	7-07-2005 @ 06:39:16 PM
Posted By : Muntz05	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I just realized how big the new Chargers actually are


#7	7-07-2005 @ 06:48:18 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#2, And all three need different styling.


#8	7-07-2005 @ 07:09:52 PM
Posted By : Tastycakemix	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Charger - I am disappointed at the Charger. Its just a Magnum without a rear. Whoopee. Mustang - Simple, powerful, and very inexpensive. A+ in my book. GTO - Minus the pathetic styling, you can't beat 400 hp for 35k.


#9	7-07-2005 @ 07:13:35 PM
Posted By : DA_MAISTA	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I like the GTO best just because it has no styling. I looks simply like a car. Charger? Have seen worse, but not charger-like cool. Mustang? The concept looked better but Im getting used to it.


#10	7-07-2005 @ 07:17:27 PM
Posted By : Tastycakemix	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#9, I understand the history with the GTO. The ratioale worked great in the 60s but to pay 35k for a phone company car isn't doing it for me. There is a dealer option available to make it look more stylish. snicker http://www.pontiac.com/gto/images/bg_image19.jpg


#11	7-07-2005 @ 07:20:20 PM
Posted By : DA_MAISTA	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#10, I just into this whole understatement-thing... btw, mine would be dark red with dark grey/black rims. Thanks.


#12	7-07-2005 @ 07:22:04 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#11, There is understatement, and then there is just bland styling. This is the latter. A good example of the former would be 80's era Mercedes and the last gen Golf/Bora.


#13	7-07-2005 @ 07:23:37 PM
Posted By : Tastycakemix	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I want a black mustang with the red Mustang sport stripe at the bottom. Saw one at a parking lot and stared at it for a few minutes. I'd slap a supercharger on it in a hearbeat. BTW: Found out there is an aftermarket S/C available for the GTO. 0_o Beware of my Torque!


#14	7-07-2005 @ 07:25:34 PM
Posted By : Tastycakemix	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#12, I agree. If this had an understatement this would sell like crazy. But it looks like a 92 Grand Am.


#15	7-07-2005 @ 07:26:34 PM
Posted By : 427 Vette	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#13, There are a lot of aftermarket options for the GTO.


#16	7-07-2005 @ 07:26:38 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#14, Exactly! The difference between bland and understated is in the proportions and the detailing.


#17	7-07-2005 @ 07:29:33 PM
Posted By : Tastycakemix	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#15, Yea, like this snicker http://www.pontiac.com/gto/images/bg_image20.jpg We built excitement? Yea, well my balls aren't tingling yet.


#18	7-07-2005 @ 07:30:58 PM
Posted By : DA_MAISTA	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#14, I am not too familiar with Pontiacs past product lineup, but I kinda see your point.


#19	7-07-2005 @ 07:31:14 PM
Posted By : 427 Vette	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#17, ahem Aftermarket http://www.lingenfelter.com/pack_pon_427.htm http://www.lingenfelter.com/pack_pon_350.htm [Edited by 427 Vette on 7-07-2005 @ 07:32:09 PM]


#20	7-07-2005 @ 07:34:56 PM
Posted By : DA_MAISTA	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#19, Its tingling now.

Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]

Login to leave a comment

	Classifieds
Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Friday, April 26, 2024 12:31:21 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.