Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 98679   By: Skid   Comment: "An interesting assortment. I'm especially intrigue..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "Toured the Charlotte Motor Speedway, ate at the Sp..."
Car: 98677   By: Skid   Comment: "I think '66 is the only year I like the Caprice ro..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the *only* team o..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 0
Average Score 0.00
Verdict Good



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=47029
Submitted by: wannabemustangjockey
Comments: 7  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 11-28-2005
View Stats Category: Photoshop/Art
Description:
1990 Ford Aerostar LWB XLT Eddie Bauer edition. 100% MSPaint.


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
11-28-2005 @ 07:04:17 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
Lol these sucked so bad...

#2
11-28-2005 @ 08:20:05 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
#1, hopefully this one doesn't.

#3
11-28-2005 @ 08:24:48 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
I always loved the styling of the Aerostar. All the lines of the body, windows, and creases all match up and flow. I just love the shapes and patterns of styling they used.

#4
11-28-2005 @ 08:28:38 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
#3, i agree, they were rather styled pretty evenly, and flowing, but the name didnt match it at all... but they ended up being pretty crappy with their 3.0litre enignes... the 4l awd ones are much better, but still boring interiors. atleast they had room...

#5
11-28-2005 @ 08:32:01 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
#4, T'were quite aerodynamic for the mid 80s though.

#6
11-28-2005 @ 08:33:14 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
#5, i guess, yeah.

#7
11-30-2006 @ 11:42:42 AM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#1, The 4.0 Ford is a rock-solid motor, the 3.0 lacked power, but wasn't a lemon, aside from the inevitable rocker panel rot that gets them all (but not till at least 10 years after they're new) I don't know what you're talking about. Heck, Ford kept the Aerostars in production for 3 years beyond where they wanted to stop building them due to public demand

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Wednesday, May 1, 2024 05:08:44 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.