Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 20705   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "DJ KHALED!..."
Car: 97661   By: Skid   Comment: "They're not the worst, but there are quite a few w..."
Car: 97661   By: DiRF   Comment: "They're like polished, oversized versions of what ..."
Car: 97661   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "those wheels are awful, especially on here...."
Car: 33317   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Before the Ineos Grenadier, there was this. I reme..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 12
Average Score 6.17
Verdict Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=6859
Submitted by: mr_mcmunkee
Comments: 55  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 06-20-2002
View Stats Category: Other Vehicle
Description:
Paris, France...Year 2002...The "SMART CAR". That's all I know!


   Comments

Showing page: 2 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]

#21
6-20-2002 @ 01:22:48 PM
Posted By : ginsu417 Reply | Edit | Del
Mmm... turbo...

#22
6-20-2002 @ 01:23:13 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Forget how bad this would look riced, how about if it were pimped?

#23
6-20-2002 @ 01:23:31 PM
Posted By : Mr Hawk Reply | Edit | Del
I have actually seen a riced out Smart in a magasine... You can get all sorts of body kits, and wings.......

#24
6-20-2002 @ 01:23:47 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
WINGS????? dear god why?

#25
6-20-2002 @ 01:24:01 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
I personally hate SUVs, except for compact SUVs, like RAV4s, Trackers, Vitaras, and the like. Any SUV made after 1992 that isn't a compact one is pretty damn stupid, unless the owner actually takes it off-road on a regular basis.

#26
6-20-2002 @ 01:25:09 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
I don't like em, but I will allow as to the eminent comfortability and legroom of my friend Jack's suburban.

#27
6-20-2002 @ 01:25:41 PM
Posted By : Mr Hawk Reply | Edit | Del
Belive you me, you don't want to see that pic of it..... Sooo horrible...

-->#25 That's why I'm a Suzuki fan, small and tough SUVs.


#28
6-20-2002 @ 01:25:52 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Wonder why they sell as well as they do? I mean, 90% of the sales are "lemming" sales, the neighbors have one so we should too, but the other 10% I wonder.....

#29
6-20-2002 @ 01:26:27 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Oh yeah, I picked 1992 (or was it 1991?). The year the Explorer came out. When that godforsaken vehicle came out, it was the beginning of the end of the SUV as a manly vehicle. Now I view almost all new SUVs as chick cars.

#30
6-20-2002 @ 01:26:39 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
most people remember suzuki as the makers of the rollover-mobile, so I guess they figured it would do better as a chevy.

#31
6-20-2002 @ 01:28:02 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Nah DiRF, it was the end of the 4X4 and in invention of the SUV, thats' what I hate, within a few years, all the tough "truckness" had been erased from the Blazer and the Cherokee, the Ram Charger was given the axe never to return and so was the Bronco, sad really

#32
6-20-2002 @ 01:30:10 PM
Posted By : Mr Hawk Reply | Edit | Del
I own one of these "roll over models". And it was only a rumor, it never rolled in any tests, and is not more prone to roll than any other small suvs actually....

I'm a member of swedens Suzuki Off roader club (Ba'Zuki) I currently own two of them..


#33
6-20-2002 @ 01:31:46 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
You're right, it never DID roll in any tests...it came very close though (2 wheels on the same side off the ground, truck at about a 35 degree angle) in a Consumer Reports test...

#34
6-20-2002 @ 01:32:54 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
I remember them making a big deal out of it, though, which is why people think of it as a rollover mobile. That and the Isuzu Somethingorother both.

#35
6-20-2002 @ 01:32:59 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Anything can be rolled over in the hands of an idiot, and that idiot invariably blames the manufacturer

#36
6-20-2002 @ 01:33:40 PM
Posted By : Mr Hawk Reply | Edit | Del
yadda yadda ;) but the A-klasse Mercedes did roll when one of the largest car magasines her ein sweden tested it, they had to rebuild if for milions of dollars because of that!

#37
6-20-2002 @ 01:34:18 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
It's not my fault I rolled over, It's FIRESTONE! Their tire blew up! And I checked the pressure just last year!

#38
6-20-2002 @ 01:34:26 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
The Izusu Trooper/Acura (whatever version of the Trooper) and the Mitsu Montero both almost rolled in CR tests also. The Mitsu Montero Sport, however DIDN'T as it is a completely different truck.

#39
6-20-2002 @ 01:34:47 PM
Posted By : cuda_man Reply | Edit | Del
I had a friend in high school roll an 87 Thunderbird, he fell asleep at the wheel traveling 70 MPH and hit a gaurd rail... not much left of the car

#40
6-20-2002 @ 01:35:38 PM
Posted By : Mr Hawk Reply | Edit | Del
The montero sport is based on the pickup.

Showing page: 2 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, November 22, 2024 03:11:50 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.