Ricecop's Rice Or Not?

Latest Comments

Car: Fpost	By: DiRF	Comment: "Now do Classical Gas!..."
Car: 98681	By: DiRF	Comment: "This must have been right around 1979, when the US..."
Car: Fpost	By: DiRF	Comment: "Very nice...."
Car: Fpost	By: Adambomb	Comment: "So, I pre-odered these last August and they finall..."
Car: 98680	By: Skid	Comment: "Neat! I don't know if I've ever seen one of these ..."

See last 25 comments

Go to
Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post

Top 10
Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad

New & Retired
Newest Images Retired Images

Other
Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats

Online Now
0 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List

This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes	9
Average Score	2.00
Verdict	Not Rice

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=69491	Submitted by: wannabemustangjockey
Comments: 31 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View)	Submitted on: 12-21-2007
View Stats	Category: Car

Description: Chrysler Sebring by John D'Agostino. Saw this turd again at another show and got the info. http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/...K2/100_9894.jpg

Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]


#21	10-23-2014 @ 05:35:02 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#20, Ditto. I keep mistaking it for an Audi at night though. Last night I was playing guess the headlights, and I kept think VW CC or something...Nope. Jesus. Even at night, those things look far better than they have any right to.


#22	10-23-2014 @ 07:03:04 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#21, Yeah, I'm with ya on the "copying Audi" in regards to the taillights... but, that's not a bad thing. Yeah, it's an imitation, but it's a very GOOD imitation, with some slight deviations to differentiate it.


#23	10-23-2014 @ 07:14:50 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#22, Agreed I like it, and as much as it pains me to say this, I hope the Chrysler goes the same style, different size look that made Audi so successful. The new 300 would look great if it were basically a bigger 200 in terms of styling. I'm not quite sure I'm a fan of the new Charger, although the Dart looks nice, and I am warming up to most of Jeep's stable. When I went out to Idaho to visit my aunt and uncle, I rented a Penstar Grand Cherokee, and it was very nice indeed. Color me very impressed. I didn't even see the need for a Hemi after getting by with the Pentastar.


#24	10-23-2014 @ 08:24:19 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
And 90% of the new 200s I see are rentals. :/


#25	10-23-2014 @ 09:01:55 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#23, The new Renegade has got my tongue wagging... you all know I adore tiny vehicles, and when one can be made as stylish, good-looking, rugged, aggressive, and cute as that... to achieve those apparent opposites. They did well. [Edited by DiRF on 10-23-2014 @ 09:02:12 PM]


#26	10-23-2014 @ 09:25:29 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#25, I like it, too. I wonder what the gas mileage is. :O


#27	10-23-2014 @ 10:18:52 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#26, Fiat hasn't exactly set the world on fire with their citycar mileage achievements... so I wouldn't keep my hopes up.


#28	10-23-2014 @ 10:20:47 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#27, this is true. But if a "midsize" sedan can get 38 MPG, a small trucklet should be able to get 35. But that's just my (flawed?) thinking?


#29	10-23-2014 @ 10:26:19 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#28, Rated 38mpg? Possibly... real world? That's where lawsuits and EPA-reevaluations come into play. I'm just happy that my car is rated at 29mpg combined, and that's exactly what it get. Mazda was at the top of a list that ranked mpg claims being honest.


#30	10-23-2014 @ 10:33:17 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#29, Funny enough, I get better than the revised EPA ratings for the C-Max. Best I've done is 54.2 tailing a semi on a slight downhill grade in southern Minnesota.. Worst was at 80 MPH with 4 people in the car, and I still pulled about 29. Is it heavy? Yes. Is it slow? Yes, but, I'm not about hooning and shit anymore. Is it fun? Well, define fun. On gravel, yes, because it has a tendency to step out due to the tires.


#31	3-11-2016 @ 01:48:08 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
and the new Pacifica looks great. New 200 looks great but will be canned. Makes me worry about where Chrysler's portfolio is headed.

Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]

Login to leave a comment

	Classifieds
Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Sunday, May 5, 2024 02:48:03 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.