|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
710 |
| Average Score |
2.58 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=7179 |
|
| Comments: 21 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 06-28-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Very nice '67 Fastback. |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #3 |
6-28-2002 @ 09:10:38 AM |
| Posted By : Wingnut |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Very nice, but I'd sell it. I'm more of a Mopar or Chevy fan. Sorry Ford fans.
|
|
| #5 |
6-28-2002 @ 09:45:21 AM |
| Posted By : Mr Hawk |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Ever since I saw Bullit for the first time when I was 12 back in 92,I have wanted a fastback stang.. I just love them.
|
|
| #6 |
6-28-2002 @ 09:48:15 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Ever since I saw nextdoors son-inlaws white supercharged one I have wanted one. It was so nice.
|
|
| #7 |
6-28-2002 @ 09:50:54 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'd prefer a coupe I think. I love Max's...you don't see as many Boss coupes as you do fastbacks.
|
|
| #8 |
6-28-2002 @ 09:53:25 AM |
| Posted By : Mr Hawk |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The Boss loks nice as a cupe, the older doesn't. The problem for me is that a Fastback in good condition cost over 10,000 here.. The car that I own know is worth mabye 2,000 and I have mabye another 1,000 to spare.... you do the math...
|
|
| #9 |
6-28-2002 @ 10:01:42 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'm getting a 68 or 69 coupe with a good motor...the body I don't care much about. I'll fix it!
|
|
| #10 |
6-28-2002 @ 10:05:30 AM |
| Posted By : Mr Hawk |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I saw a 67 convertible for sale today, 26,000$.... The only cheap ones are the coupes, and those aren't very cheap either... Saw a decent boss '71 for 8,000...
|
|
| #13 |
6-28-2002 @ 10:09:44 AM |
| Posted By : Mr Hawk |
Reply | Edit | Del |
That's just to expensive, you can get a good new car for that..
|
|
| #14 |
6-28-2002 @ 10:17:12 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I think it's better than a new car...and really that IS like a new car...new body, interior, rebuilt engine, everything perfect.
|
|
| #15 |
6-28-2002 @ 10:20:00 AM |
| Posted By : Mr Hawk |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yes but you cant drive it daily, just drinks way to much gas...
|
|
| #16 |
6-28-2002 @ 11:11:16 AM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Most US cars from this era were very thirsty, even the "Economy" versions of them will get mielage that is abysmal by European standards, and I'd assume insurance/lisenceing fees are also pretty steep
|
|
| #18 |
8-18-2002 @ 01:44:17 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
If I had to choose between a perfect musclecar or an SUV...either getting 12-15 MPH, I'd pick the musclecar. Anyone with a brain would. The SUV "fad" is about over but musclecars will live forever.
|
|
| #20 |
8-22-2002 @ 11:42:35 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Some ricers hate this car...it was #1 this morning, now it's out of the top 10!
[Edited by mr_mcmunkee on 8-22-2002 @ 11:43:31 AM]
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
