|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=7230 |
|
| Comments: 9 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 06-29-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
1964 300K |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #1 |
6-29-2002 @ 10:04:58 AM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Chrysler was going through a period of questionable styling when these were built, too bad, the ugliness really detracts from a good, powerfull car
|
|
| #2 |
6-29-2002 @ 10:06:37 AM |
| Posted By : Mr Hawk |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Those are so damn ugly, even makes the Edsel look good.
|
|
| #4 |
6-29-2002 @ 10:08:42 AM |
| Posted By : Jon |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I love this car, its got that b-pillarless look, i love. its a cruiser.
|
|
| #5 |
6-29-2002 @ 10:09:19 AM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Imperials were even worse syling wise, around this time is when they had the goofy diagonaly set headlights, even collectors shy away from them because of thier relatively ugly looks
|
|
| #6 |
6-29-2002 @ 10:10:20 AM |
| Posted By : Jon |
Reply | Edit | Del |
yea those are pretty awful, but looks to me were always second
|
|
| #7 |
7-17-2002 @ 03:13:17 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
THIS? UGLY? Are you on crack or what? It's a totally clean, shapely auto. The last of the true 300s.
|
|
| #9 |
7-17-2002 @ 03:16:41 PM |
| Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'd own one. To sell it and buy a Pontiac. I might take the engine out first.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
