|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
Total Votes |
484 |
Average Score |
2.70 |
Verdict |
Not Rice
|
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=7727 |
|
Comments: 48 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 07-09-2002
|
View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
Description:
Ferrari FX |
Showing page: 2 of 3 [ 1 2 3 ]
|
#21 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:19:18 AM |
Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah... but plenty of cars can do that that look far better than this... thing. And as for form following function, if form followed function, this would look like an F1 car. Since it doesn't, I must conclude that the body is strictly for stylistic purposes. And the styling reeks. |
|
#22 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:19:55 AM |
Posted By : nachobitch |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah, that pointy nose is butt...just doesn't seem as sleek and sexy as most other ferrari designs are. |
|
#23 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:21:45 AM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Pleanty hey, maybe but they cant handel at all, much less at speed. Im not saying I like the look of it but when you have one it dont matter what it looks like, it goes like stink. |
|
#24 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:21:53 AM |
Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
And the greenhouse looks like they unsuccessfully tried to transplant the cockpit out of a 456 into this... nasty. But hey, everything except the greenhouse and the nose looks pretty damn good. |
|
#25 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:23:12 AM |
Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
"Can't handle?" Pagani Zonda, Ford GT40, Saleen S7, Lamborghini Murcielago, Callaway Corvette, Hennessey Viper can't handle? I'm not talking CHEAP cars, I'm talking this car's direct competitors, all of which CAN handle. And in that list, the Enzo comes in dead last in my book. |
|
#26 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:23:43 AM |
Posted By : nachobitch |
Reply | Edit | Del |
nah, I also dont like the doors or rear fenders/brake vents. |
|
#27 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:26:16 AM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I dont call that pleanty of cars. All Im saying is looks like crap but absoulty hoons. And vipers dont handel unless money is poured in to them. One over here just used for racing had $1 000 000 just to get it up to speed of the 911, 360s etc. Im not knocking the viper but unless significantly reworked they arent much good for anything but a straight line. |
|
#28 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:26:19 AM |
Posted By : Moose |
Reply | Edit | Del |
you guys are being rough on this one :Þ |
|
#29 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:28:56 AM |
Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I have no facts to back this up, but I suspect that for the difference between the price of this and a Viper, I could make the Viper hang with it fine in handling. And my point is, this isn't the best-performing car in the world, this isn't the best-performing car in its class, and I'm pretty sure it's not the cheapest car with that sort of performance, so if I had that kind of money, this would be waaaay down on my list. |
|
#30 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:30:28 AM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Hell if I had that kind of money I would have so many cars. Stuff just getting one when you can have 50 or so. One a week. |
|
#31 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:31:58 AM |
Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
EXACTLY. Honestly, why spend that much money on a car whose potential you can't use on the street when you could buy an honest-to-God race car for the track and ten badass street cars? |
|
#32 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:34:05 AM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Its called billionares who need something so people will look at them. |
|
#33 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:35:48 AM |
Posted By : nachobitch |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I cant imagine paying so much for a car that i was afraid to take it out of my garage for fear of messing up the 14000$ paint job. |
|
#34 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:37:07 AM |
Posted By : nachobitch |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Also on just about all ferrari's you have to change the timing belt I believe every 15000 miles, and it costs about 3000$ to do.
|
|
#35 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:39:37 AM |
Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Honestly, I've talked to Ferrari owners about people's reactions to their cars... I think the general public PREFERS my Mustang. Just as many "Hey, nice car, man," and many less hostile stares and key attacks. And it cost approximately 1/25th as much as a low-end Ferrari. |
|
#36 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:44:02 AM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
But its not a Ferrari. Anyway final thing Im saying on this. I want a porsche as they are very good cars, look nice etc, cheapest of the real supercars. But I still want my commodore and my sleeper whatever that sleeper ends up being. The general public relates better to cars they see everyday, if its nice you get nice comments. People tend not to like rich show-offs. |
|
#37 |
7-10-2002 @ 02:48:48 AM |
Posted By : nachobitch |
Reply | Edit | Del |
True, supercars aren't bought for performance. You could easily spend half as much and make a supra or M3 (and many other cars) up to 900 hp, which would smoke this ferrari. Supercars are bought to be flashy. To show you have so much money you don't know what to do with it anymore. |
|
#38 |
7-17-2002 @ 09:18:32 AM |
Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Wow. Ferrari really screwed this one up. I don't care if it's got 5,000hp, that's the kind of ugly you just can't get away from. Well, people, I think we've finally found a Ferrari you can't pick up tail in. |
|
#39 |
7-17-2002 @ 09:20:10 AM |
Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
You'd have a better chance gettin' women in a Yugo. |
|
#40 |
7-17-2002 @ 09:22:51 AM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
No you can pick up in ANY ferrari. Its the name, not the car. |
Showing page: 2 of 3 [ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|