Ricecop's Rice Or Not?

Latest Comments

Car: 53141	By: DiRF	Comment: "B-but... but... TIRE GO BRRRRRRR AND MAEK PERTTY S..."
Car: 92734	By: DiRF	Comment: "Their homegrown cars haven't done them any favors,..."
Car: 92734	By: Skid	Comment: "It's sad how much of Chrysler's reputation has bee..."
Car: 53141	By: Skid	Comment: "I see what you did there. And these colored tires..."
Car: 53141	By: DiRF	Comment: "Those colored tires never got any traction on the ..."

See last 25 comments

Go to
Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post

Top 10
Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad

New & Retired
Newest Images Retired Images

Other
Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats

Online Now
0 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List

This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes	4
Average Score	2.00
Verdict	Not Rice

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=80973	Submitted by: wannabemustangjockey
Comments: 17 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View)	Submitted on: 03-15-2010
View Stats	Category: Car

Description: 1978 Buick Century aeroback sedan

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]


#1	3-15-2010 @ 06:12:35 AM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
This was a strange bodystyle....but I'd sport it.


#2	3-15-2010 @ 11:13:57 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
This bodystyle was a massive failure... it failed when Pontiac attempted it again with the Aztek. ...but now, for some reason, Honda, Acura and BMW (x2), are attempting it yet again...


#3	3-15-2010 @ 12:02:55 PM
Posted By : Sensekhmet	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I never saw the appeal of a caved-in roof styling. Fastback can only works with 2 (3) doors.


#4	3-15-2010 @ 03:19:34 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#3, Agreed... for me, the 5-door hatch, station wagon, and 3-door fastback all "work", aesthetically... when a company tries stradling bodystyles, and makes a 5-door fastback... it just... doesn't work... it ESPECIALLY doesn't work when the company tries jacking up the suspension to make it into an SUV... yuck.


#5	3-15-2010 @ 03:42:08 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#2, Add the Rover SD1 to that list of failures, too. But that was more of a quality problem... I actually kind of like the way the SD1 looks.


#6	3-15-2010 @ 03:58:27 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#5, Hmmm... the SD1 was a rare example, where, aesthetically, it worked..but that was mainly because it had a sleek, low, front-end, not a tall, upright, or bulbous front-end.


#7	3-15-2010 @ 05:59:09 PM
Posted By : Obsidian	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#2, Cit CX? BX? XM? The name of the bodystyle is 'Kammback' - although marketers recoil at the name nowadays (likely don't even know what it is) - they've repackaged it as a '4 door coupe'.


#8	3-15-2010 @ 06:58:20 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#7, Ok, fine, let me just expand on #6 and say that when a vehicle has a sleek front-end, it can pull-off a 5-door fastback body... when the front end is just blocky, ugly, bulbous, or upright, it CANNOT pull off that look.


#9	3-15-2010 @ 07:49:16 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
What about the Mexican-market VAM Lerma? :P Anyway, I don't see many of these anymore. I saw one today though, for some odd reason it wasn't rusted away.


#10	3-15-2010 @ 08:42:53 PM
Posted By : Obsidian	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#8, Chev Corscia Hatchback? They werent blocky.


#11	7-14-2015 @ 11:37:37 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#10, But it was still a Corsica. :P But, seriously, that was more of a hatchback than a "fastback"... God, I'm splitting hairs here.


#12	7-15-2015 @ 12:11:43 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Off topic, but I've always wondered why some cars with fastback rooflines have conventional trunks (cough Mustang).


#13	7-15-2015 @ 12:25:03 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#12, Because we have to keep American sensibilities in mind. And, sadly, America is full of stupid, stupid people, who thumb their noses at even the slightest whiff of "hatchback"... (or "minivan", for that matter, causing the general public to buy overpriced, cramped, less-practical SUVs)


#14	7-15-2015 @ 12:31:38 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#13, I wonder if I'm in a small group, then? I seem to like such oddities as the VW Sharan, Kia Rondo, and small, but not tiny people movers.


#15	7-17-2015 @ 01:18:34 AM
Posted By : Tastycakemix	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#13, Agree. Some of those SUVs are REALLY tight inside. When I had a minivan, it was immensely fun and roomy.


#16	7-17-2015 @ 01:55:30 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#15, I'm not terribly fond of my sister's GLK... for being such a thirsty, lumbering compact SUV, it's god-damned cramped inside.


#17	7-17-2015 @ 02:23:28 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#16, and its not very reliable either, I imagine? Sister just traded HER 2010 GLK350 4Matic for a new 2015 Honda Civic EX coupe in Rallye Red.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]

Login to leave a comment

	Classifieds
Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Sunday, May 19, 2024 10:03:46 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.