Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 81412   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "NSU Prinz too...."
Car: 81412   By: DiRF   Comment: "I can see where you're coming from in regards to t..."
Car: 81412   By: Skid   Comment: "It does bring to mind a two-door version of the la..."
Car: 81412   By: DiRF   Comment: "That is incredibly... British-looking for a BMW......"
Car: 87080   By: Low-Tech Redneck   Comment: "Push down, pull it back, and watch it go right up ..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=91528
Submitted by: ricerocketboy
Comments: 12  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 09-23-2014
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme convertible


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
9-24-2014 @ 11:45:20 AM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
I really like the style of these.

#2
9-24-2014 @ 06:43:37 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
The tiny, recessed headlight fixtures were always kinda neat, IMO... honestly, Oldsmobile had really decent styling in its final couple of decades...

#3
9-24-2014 @ 08:47:09 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#2, Agreed. I think I liked the Bravada most of the 2002 redesigned SUVs too.

#4
9-24-2014 @ 10:03:57 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#3, Actually... no, I didn't like the 2002 Bravada... nor the Silhouette (*any* generation of it)

...the pre-2002 Bravada was rather handsome... but the 2002+ Bravada only looked ok when they put a Buick grille on its schnozz and called it the Rainier.


#5
9-24-2014 @ 10:05:35 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
#4, I like the Rainier, 9-7X and TrailBlazer SS myself.

#6
9-24-2014 @ 10:14:04 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#5, The 9-7x looked... ok. Its styling was alright... but its very existence was an affront to the brand as a whole, and represented the very worst of what horrors rebadging can bring.

The Trailblazer SS was pretty damn nice looking... even though Chevrolet went nuts with SS versions across their entire lineup, *most* of the SS vehicles were quite splendid.

...and, yeah, I was a big fan of the Rainier. In my opinion, that was when they finally nailed a proper "luxury" version of the GMT360, in terms of styling, and fitting in with its brand's image. I also quite liked the Rendezvous... it was all the practicality and useful quirkiness of the Aztek, without the assface and humpback.

[Edited by DiRF on 9-24-2014 @ 10:16:02 PM]


#7
9-24-2014 @ 10:16:15 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#6, I think my favorite "new" Oldsmobile would have to be the CSCoupes and Convertibles.. along with the N-body Cutlass and Achieva.

#8
9-24-2014 @ 10:17:11 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
I quite liked the Alero... it was essentially a conservative and handsome Pontiac Grand Am. The 2nd-gen Aurora was a bit... awkward in its appearance... the first gen pulled off the futuristic styling much, MUCH better.

#9
9-24-2014 @ 10:21:50 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#8, YES.

I still like the first-generation Aurora. I liked the Alero in coupe form, not so much the sedans. Then again, I don't really like most sedans in general. :/ I'm more of a wagon/hatch/SUV guy.

I wonder why GM never did W-body wagons?


#10
9-24-2014 @ 10:29:36 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
#9, Because SUV.

#11
9-24-2014 @ 10:31:39 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#10, true :(

#12
9-25-2014 @ 01:35:13 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#10, ...and the US Government exempting "trucks" from stricter fuel economy standards at one point... so, if a company jacked up the suspension and gave it a flat load floor with folding seats, *POOF*, no fuel economy restrictions...

...that loophole has since been closed, and the general public actually *care* about fuel economy now, but the damage has been done.


Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, October 20, 2017 05:00:28 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Ricecop. All rights reserved.