Go to car

Latest Comments
Car: 96930   By: DiRF   Comment: "...those don't look like Jaguar whee- ..."
Car: 96930   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "XJ wheels...."
Car: 96999   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "I don't think this was ever intended to sell here...."
Car: 96931   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "'66?..."
Car: 97004   By: Adambomb   Comment: "https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1875/44700034152_c6c..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Bling Bling
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images


Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List




Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password

View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.

Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=94166
Submitted by: ricerocketboy
Comments: 7  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 01-09-2016
View Stats Category: Car
Ford Mustang Cobra II


Showing page: 1 of 1
1 ]

1-09-2016 @ 09:26:24 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
From a stylistic standpoint, I quite like the Mustang II... from a performance and engineering standpoint... not so much...

1-09-2016 @ 11:09:56 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
#1, I like them too.
The nice thing about a Mustang II is if it's smog exempt in your state you can go wild with it and make a small and light little car that can actually do great things. There's a local guy who tears up the autocross with a 2.3 turbo '74 Pinto.

In California where I live, only the 1974-75 Mustang IIs are smog exempt because bureaucrats are idiots and refuse to relax the pre-1975 testing exemption to a rolling cutoff, while ever-tightening the regulations on anything newer.

1-10-2016 @ 12:29:48 AM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#1, That's the 70's in a nutshell, styling wasted on boat anchors under the hood.

1-10-2016 @ 06:37:38 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
The platform was pretty good (great for the time, actually), and while the 302 was hideously underpowered in factory guise, a credit card and a Summit catalog go a long way towards taking care of that.

As I understand, the biggest issue with these are the tiny wheels and tiny wheelwells, necessitating some plasma cutting if you want to fit decent rolling stock. There's also the issue of the four lug spindles/axles limiting wheel and brake choices, though this issue is shared with the Fox-bodies.

1-10-2016 @ 06:49:44 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#4, It may just be a skewed perspective, but the wheels on this look to be five spoke-styled, which, judging bolt placement, would mean this has five-lug wheels?

1-10-2016 @ 07:39:06 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#5, They're 4-spoke pseudo-Magnum 500s, similar to the wheels on this one: http://www.mustangii.org/gallery/AllanKlingler/

Note that in the front quarter views, they sort of resemble five-spokes. Ford probably counted on that.

1-10-2016 @ 05:13:51 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#6, Ah, I was right... skewed perspective.

Showing page: 1 of 1
1 ]

Login to leave a comment

Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 12:31:00 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2018 Ricecop. All rights reserved.