|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
5 |
| Average Score |
6.40 |
| Verdict |
Bad
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=10953 |
|
| Comments: 11 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 09-13-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Misc |
|
|
Description:
F1. |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #1 |
9-13-2002 @ 02:36:13 AM |
| Posted By : blackcat77 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Everybody thought gravel traps were going to be such a great safety measure, turns out that if a car hits them sideways, they flip -- as in this pic -- and if they hit them straight on, the braking is ineffective. Now they're being replaced with paved runoffs...
|
|
| #2 |
9-13-2002 @ 03:00:51 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Thats because F1 cars are piss weak and weigh 600kgs.
|
|
| #3 |
9-13-2002 @ 07:59:55 AM |
| Posted By : noname |
Reply | Edit | Del |
More than you cna afford pal, Ferrai
|
|
| #4 |
9-29-2002 @ 12:25:18 AM |
| Posted By : AtEase |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2 They are that light, but they aren't weak. In what other car can you loose control in 300km/h and crash into a wall and just break one leg?
|
|
| #5 |
10-29-2002 @ 04:37:20 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
racing F1 cars over water is not a good idea? doesnt it look like it...
|
|
| #8 |
1-29-2003 @ 06:51:41 PM |
| Posted By : Orem |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Oh my. I hope the driver was alright.
|
|
| #9 |
1-29-2003 @ 06:55:12 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#1, Makes sense. I mean, the cars were DESIGNED to be driven on paved surfaces, not dirt or gravel. A gravel pit may slow the car down a bit, but more paved surface would probably be safer.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
