|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
209 |
| Average Score |
2.81 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=12768 |
|
| Comments: 27 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 10-16-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
1966 Mustang GT |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #2 |
10-16-2002 @ 09:32:48 AM |
| Posted By : mustangpower21 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
This is my sweat ride, use to kill the mad tyte RIZIDEZ. THey always want to race but I beat them every time.
|
|
| #5 |
10-16-2002 @ 09:38:04 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
how quick are they? the whole design of the car just looks like it was meant for cruising, not racing...but i guess it could be plenty quick, oh yeah, and has the gas tank ever blown up if a kid on a bike rear-ended you or something :)
|
|
| #6 |
10-16-2002 @ 09:40:46 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, The problem wasn't THAT bad with most old cars, mainly just Pintos. My dad's Nova has a rear-fill gas tank too. If they put them in new cars, they'd probaby explode with a kid on a bike, because new cars and the metal used are CRAP compared to the quality of old cars.
|
|
| #7 |
10-16-2002 @ 09:42:09 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
mostly pintos? what about the big-ass scandal with the old mustangs...their gas tanks would rupture in a mild collision?
|
|
| #8 |
10-16-2002 @ 09:50:18 AM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7 - you mean the mustang II? does that share the same platform as the pinto? The pinto was the most famous exploding car... see the movie 'Top Secret'.
|
|
| #9 |
10-16-2002 @ 09:57:00 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, The "Mustangs" that Ford made in the mid- to late-70's aren't real Mustangs in my book. Same with the 80's up until 1989.
|
|
| #10 |
10-16-2002 @ 10:32:41 AM |
| Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9 - what's wrong with the early carbed Fox body GTs - ie, 1985? Can be built up pretty nicely. Also the '86s-'88s, while only speed density, were still fast and fun cars. Can be converted to MAF if you want.
|
|
| #11 |
10-16-2002 @ 11:12:36 AM |
| Posted By : mustangpower21 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It is a cruiser, but it has a 289 HiPO. It will sure as shit beat a type r wearing, oversize wing using civic, integra or whatever. I'm always just crusing on a Saturday and one of these stupid rice boys want to race at a light. Well I give them a chance and they lose. It is not a race car buy any means it's a classic with orginal American power.
|
|
| #14 |
10-28-2002 @ 09:27:18 AM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, and that should be 87 cause the only thing thats not the same is 87-88 didn't have mass air
|
|
| #17 |
3-14-2003 @ 03:25:35 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Maybe someday your husband will get you one just like it. Be nice to him!
|
|
| #18 |
3-14-2003 @ 03:26:52 PM |
| Posted By : fallenstar16 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
oh trust me, i love my husband with all my heart and everything i have. I LOVE THAT CAR!!
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
