|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=14265 |
|
| Comments: 98 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 11-10-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Photoshop/Art |
Photoshop of: 9614
|
Description:
much better |
Showing page: 3 of 5
[ 1 2 3 4 5 ]
 |
| #41 |
11-24-2002 @ 10:04:49 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#36, And they're just different levels of accessorization. Mine's the minimum--power accessories, but no ABS, traction control, leather seats, bigger wheels, or upgraded stereo. Which is just as well, because I'd rather not be lugging around all that extra weight, and all the extra electrical stuff that can fail.
|
|
| #42 |
11-24-2002 @ 10:05:44 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
and there was the GT-S for awhile. NO GT-R MUSTANGS WERE MADE
|
|
| #44 |
11-24-2002 @ 10:07:27 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'd buy a new 'Stang in a heartbeat if I could get one without power accesories. I might still get a GT 5 speed, but I'm a bit wary. I think I'll wait and see how the new GTOs turn out.
|
|
| #47 |
11-24-2002 @ 10:09:41 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#46, Just '94 and '95, I think. I'm not sure how many they made.
|
|
| #49 |
11-24-2002 @ 10:11:23 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
according to my mustang book the only diffrence between the 87-91s and 92-93s was bodycolor trim on the 92-93s
|
|
| #52 |
11-24-2002 @ 10:11:39 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#47, yep just 94 and 95, dont know the numbers but they were low, and red was least color
|
Showing page: 3 of 5
[ 1 2 3 4 5 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
