|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
592 |
| Average Score |
2.60 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=14613 |
|
| Comments: 41 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 11-15-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Very first production Mustang |
Showing page: 1 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
 |
| #1 |
11-15-2002 @ 09:29:40 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Ford had to "bribe" the owner with a brand-new Mustang to get him to sell it back to them, he loved the car that much
|
|
| #3 |
11-15-2002 @ 09:30:34 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
yep they screwed up and sent this one to a dealership in Canada if i remember right
|
|
| #4 |
11-15-2002 @ 09:30:53 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, Good thing too, the car was living in some northern climate, and had a bit of fender rust when they got it back
|
|
| #5 |
11-15-2002 @ 09:31:47 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The first Mustang was a bit bland looking, really. I find it hard to believe the first one was a convertible.
|
|
| #6 |
11-15-2002 @ 09:35:44 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, as hard as it may be to believe, it was. seen the story about on some TV show
|
|
| #7 |
11-15-2002 @ 09:36:31 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, That' was "Hisory's lost and found" saw the same episode, so I knew the car too the instant I saw it
|
|
| #12 |
11-26-2002 @ 10:32:19 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
looks like it has the V badge on the fender, so i would guess it was a V8 (260)
|
|
| #16 |
11-26-2002 @ 10:35:48 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13, to FORD they all were 65s, only collecters and car nuts call early 65s 64 1/2. and the first V8 in the stang was the 260, which was soon replaced by the 289
|
|
| #17 |
11-26-2002 @ 10:36:40 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
If I'm not mistaken, 289s came out for 1965, all '64s had 260s. Or was the 289 optional in '64?
|
|
| #19 |
12-25-2002 @ 04:16:58 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#18, There were changes made to the car in late 1964. Hence, I consider cars built from April-late 1964 as '64s and all cars being built right before 1965 as '65 models.
|
Showing page: 1 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
