|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
592 |
| Average Score |
2.60 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=14613 |
|
| Comments: 41 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 11-15-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Very first production Mustang |
Showing page: 2 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
 |
| #21 |
12-25-2002 @ 04:19:30 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#19, yes, like i said, only ford looks at them as 65s, what we know has the 64s had a 260 in it, the 289 wasn't put in untill mid 65 model year
|
|
| #24 |
12-25-2002 @ 04:24:08 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
If I'm not mistaken, all '64 1/2 Mustangs are liscensed and titled as '64 models. I know a friend of mine had a black '64 1/2 coupe with a 289 (kinda junky, but he loved it) and it was titled as a 1964 model car. I suppose it was Ford alone that thought of them as '65s.
[Edited by Skid on 12-25-2002 @ 04:24:56 PM]
|
|
| #38 |
12-31-2002 @ 07:07:15 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
what can I say when I commit to bring something in to the top ten it damn well gets there
|
|
| #40 |
1-01-2003 @ 12:43:33 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
damn, sure didn't take long for this to start getting jaked up with tens
|
Showing page: 2 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
