|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=22175 |
|
| Comments: 63 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 04-28-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Here's an N/A tuner. The engine is 115 hp stock, tuned up to run 13.506@102.41 in the quarter. "Just won 1st place at the Jamie Outland and Sweet Deceptions Memorial Car Show in DesMoins. Took 1st place at 158db with one JL12W7 at Stereo Comp in Ames Two weeks prior. Won 2nd Place In Pontiac Mild At J-Bash 02. Fiber Customs is my new sponsor."
|
Showing page: 2 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
 |
| #21 |
1-23-2004 @ 08:41:28 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#16, Mod list is inconsistent with underhood shot to some degree; it mentions nitrous but not the rather large turbocharger evident in the picture.
|
|
| #22 |
1-23-2004 @ 08:42:18 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#19, 12s is in fact not "freeking fast", and what i drive doesn't effect if i have good taste or not.
|
|
| #23 |
1-23-2004 @ 08:42:57 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#20, And if you're still going to try to defend it...please...don't...do...this...because...it...is...hard...to...read...
Also, rice has very little, if anything, to do with how fast a car actually is.
|
|
| #25 |
1-23-2004 @ 08:44:56 PM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I personally dont care how fast it is. I still wouldnt be caught dead driving this abomination on the streets. Its a freaking joke visually. If you drive fast enough on the street to prove that it is as fast as you claim, then you are an idiot.
[Edited by Biohazard on 1-23-2004 @ 08:45:15 PM]
|
|
| #26 |
1-23-2004 @ 08:45:24 PM |
| Posted By : carbonfire |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The members page is not updated it was just a place to dump pictures lately.... and no I would really like to know what kind of POS you drive.... Good taste is not the question here... the fact of the matter is the last time this thing touched the track it was in the 12's ..... and sence than over 6,000 was dumped into that motor and traney and drive train.... also about 500 lbs was taken out of that car and the new motor was engine dynoed at 450+ hp
|
|
| #27 |
1-23-2004 @ 08:46:09 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
plus if you are going to work on a 4 banger, atleast use a 5 speed.
[Edited by stang392 on 1-23-2004 @ 08:46:44 PM]
|
|
| #29 |
1-23-2004 @ 08:48:39 PM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Dammit. I wish I could stick around for this, but my girlfriend is coming over to go out to dinner. Why couldn't you come on on a regular weekday? Not Friday night. :-P
|
|
| #31 |
1-23-2004 @ 08:49:52 PM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#30, It would be sad if that was all. Im sure he put a lot more money into it before the turbo too. How insanely sad.
|
|
| #32 |
1-23-2004 @ 08:49:53 PM |
| Posted By : carbonfire |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Dude if you knew anything about cars you would realize that a Turbo car is much faster with a Auto tranney than a sitck and there is no lag between gears and it is also possible to launch at a much higher RPM and be spooled at launch.....
And it would only be considered a money pit if it where not sponsored for racing. And no I would not drive that fast on the street ever. Not a safe practice. I am a member of NHRA and do all my racing on the track
Umm you also have to realize that I said it was that much money into the motor, traney, ect.... which includes the suspension, body, ect... to make the car safe and reliable on the road.
Still no answer on that car you have..
[Edited by carbonfire on 1-23-2004 @ 08:51:40 PM]
|
|
| #34 |
1-23-2004 @ 08:53:32 PM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Dont care how fast it is. It cant outrun the uglyness.
Oh, and I drive a Volvo and am proud of it. Doesnt attract any attention and it gets me around while Im in college. When I get out, I will have the sense to buy a real man's car. i.e. an American RWD V8 powered muscle car. You have maxed out your car. I will have just started when I hit the high 12s.
|
|
| #35 |
1-23-2004 @ 08:56:09 PM |
| Posted By : carbonfire |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#33, Tis sad that that little 4cylinder has more power than your Mustang.... Tho I will say I do like your mustang. I am into fast old cars also. I also do have more respect for V8's than 4 cylinders. But becasue I was brought up in a racing family and everyone in the family races a V8 they said I should enter the import class... but I was not about to enter it was a Civic or something... Atleast I went domestic
Also the car is not maxed out at all... GM has gotten over 1000HP out of the ecotec and even tho this is not an eco it is a much stronger motor that takes after V8 and 4 cylinder technology. GM estimates that that motor can produce as much hp as the eco with the right tuning also
[Edited by carbonfire on 1-23-2004 @ 08:58:04 PM]
|
|
| #37 |
1-23-2004 @ 08:58:57 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#35, yeah, yet my car is still N/A, stock heads, M.A.S, TB, and so on. plus i have spent a lot less then what you have
|
|
| #38 |
1-23-2004 @ 09:01:07 PM |
| Posted By : carbonfire |
Reply | Edit | Del |
But the point also is you could be much faster but you dont either have the money or the time or the effort to make it faster. Atleast I started with a goal in mind and am compleating it
|
|
| #39 |
1-23-2004 @ 09:01:18 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#37, Limit on a stock bottom-end 5.0 is pretty darn high, and if that isn't enough there's always the rest of the Windsor family.
|
|
| #40 |
1-23-2004 @ 09:02:14 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#35, so you have common sense, and your car is fast, no get rid of the rice and it would be nice
|
Showing page: 2 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
