Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 98677   By: Skid   Comment: "I think '66 is the only year I like the Caprice ro..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the *only* team o..."
Car: 78637   By: DiRF   Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=27809
Submitted by: 427 Vette
Comments: 14  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 1  (View)
Submitted on: 10-17-2003
View Stats Category: Vehicle Group
Description:
Porsche GT3, 993 RS (I think) and Mclaren F1.


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
10-17-2003 @ 05:20:19 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
This picture is sorta like if you had two Geo Metro's and a Ferrari 360 Modena, putting the Metro's up front. I love 911's (especially 993's) but thats what a McLaren F1 does, instant emasculation to ANY car you park next to it.

[Edited by thirtyseven on 10-17-2003 @ 05:20:50 PM]


#2
10-17-2003 @ 07:41:50 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
F1 is mine

#3
10-17-2003 @ 10:51:16 PM
Posted By : Phantom1 Reply | Edit | Del
#1, what if you parked it next to a bugatti veyron?

#4
10-18-2003 @ 04:35:04 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
#3, The Bugatti has more power, but the Macca is the better car by far.

#5
10-18-2003 @ 04:44:24 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Ehhh....I'd rather take one of the Porsched. McLarens aren't THAT special...they have a high top speed, a high price, and little else.

[Edited by Skid on 10-18-2003 @ 04:44:52 PM]


#6
10-18-2003 @ 04:46:01 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
#5, Have you ever read much about the engineering and time that went into that car?

#7
10-18-2003 @ 04:50:03 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#6, A lot of time and engineering goes into all cars. The Porsches have a lot of time and engineering in them, too.

#8
10-18-2003 @ 04:55:57 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#7, Yet the McLaren sort of takes craftsmanship to another level compared to the Porsche 911. For example (if a video segment I saw was correct), the body is a hand-laid carbon-fiber monococque, and the car is extensively hand-assembled. The suspension tuning is suposedly top-notch, the engine is a rather impressive unit sourced from BMW, etc.

#9
10-18-2003 @ 04:56:39 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
#7, There is a 700 page book dedicated to the obsessive detail and planning that went into this car. For example, every nut and bolt was computer designed to be as light, strong, and small as possible for it's given application. There is a whole chapter on the time spent honing the shifter, and I mean it's material, not the mechanism. BMW spent more man hours developing the engine than most manufacturers spen on an entire car, not to mention the custom made gearbox, aerodynamic tuning etc etc etc etc. There isnt one piece of plastic in the entire car, even the instruments are etched into a piece of better than aircraft grade aluminum billet. Kenwood spent millions just developing the stereo system. So, yes, it is rather special.

#10
10-18-2003 @ 05:14:40 PM
Posted By : Obsidian Reply | Edit | Del
#9, you know GM makes some of BMW's automatics.

#11
10-18-2003 @ 05:17:18 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#10, And this is relevant to an engine they developed for a supercar intended to be purchased with a manual transmission how?

#12
10-18-2003 @ 05:21:40 PM
Posted By : Obsidian Reply | Edit | Del
#11, it's not relevant to an engine they developed for a supercar intended to be purchased with a manual transmission.

it's relevant to transmissions.


#13
10-18-2003 @ 06:18:54 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#11, who knows

#14
10-19-2003 @ 12:13:29 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Meh...the McLaren still doesn't do anything for me.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, April 25, 2024 08:57:44 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.