|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=30269 |
|
| Comments: 29 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-11-2004
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Photoshop/Art |
Photoshop of: 22248
|
Description:
look better?
i photoshoped RWD in it |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #2 |
2-11-2004 @ 11:44:45 PM |
| Posted By : Jesuz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
yeah. GM really does sucks. the whole company is all fucked up. from design to marketing.
look at GTO for example . 35000 for an overweighted 8+ year old platform and 90's styling .... G35 out peforms it for about the same money and killer looks.
|
|
| #3 |
2-11-2004 @ 11:54:09 PM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, The GTO is going to replaced after only a few years with an all new one if it sells well. The G35 is roughly equivalent to a LT1 Z28 in speed. A GTO will slaughter it.
|
|
| #6 |
2-12-2004 @ 12:25:04 AM |
| Posted By : V8Tbird |
Reply | Edit | Del |
ya, it still looks like crap. I don't think anything can be done for these.
|
|
| #7 |
2-12-2004 @ 12:38:55 AM |
| Posted By : Jesuz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
1/4 mile, no doubt the GTO will kill the 35. but in over all handling, breaking and build quality G35> GTO.
|
|
| #8 |
2-12-2004 @ 01:08:03 AM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, Can you back that up? From what I understand the GTO handles really well. Plus how do you know about the build quality? The build quality should be similar the Holden Monaro which has really good - much better than US GM interiors have been.
Btw, I'm not biased against the G35. I love it. I would only slightly want a GTO more. I think people make a lot of assumptions about the GTO though because it's a GM product and they base it on past US models.
[Edited by SuperDave479 on 2-12-2004 @ 01:10:10 AM]
|
|
| #9 |
2-12-2004 @ 01:13:03 AM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, Ok, I just looked up the braking. The GTO stops (60-0) in 120ft. The G35 Coupe stops in 112ft. Of course the GTO is heavier with its V8. Skidpad numbers are up for the G35 but they don't have numbers on the GTO.
|
|
| #10 |
2-12-2004 @ 01:18:43 AM |
| Posted By : Jesuz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, 120 for GTO? dont think so. i dont have the exact numbers for the GTO but i read about it on car and driver and i remember the GTO needs lot more room to stop than g35. and overall, the G35 is better. dont get me wrong. i like v8 too but if i had 35000 to spent , GM wouldnt be the one talking it .
|
|
| #12 |
2-12-2004 @ 01:26:54 AM |
| Posted By : Jesuz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
car and driver backs me up with 185f to stop from 60
[Edited by Jesuz on 2-12-2004 @ 01:27:57 AM]
|
|
| #13 |
2-12-2004 @ 01:28:24 AM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Ok, found the Car and Driver article on the GTO. It has skidpad numbers on it.
G35 Coupe (Motor Trend): 0.87g
GTO (C&D): 0.88g
|
|
| #15 |
2-12-2004 @ 01:31:56 AM |
| Posted By : Jesuz |
Reply | Edit | Del |
just different opinions, i like both cars but yeah, im just really disappointled with GM bring back the GTO from over sea. use the platform for monte SS yes, GTO, no thanks
|
|
| #17 |
2-12-2004 @ 01:33:15 AM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15, Right, and of course you're entitled to your opinion and the G35 is a great car. I just want credit given where credit is due.
|
|
| #18 |
2-12-2004 @ 01:34:10 AM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#16, I tried looking up the numbers on the G35 at C&D's website but they don't even list the stopping distance.
|
|
| #19 |
2-12-2004 @ 01:34:56 AM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'd like to talk some more but I really gotta go to bed. It's half past midnight and work comes at 8 AM. Later all.
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
