|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=34665 |
|
| Comments: 12 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 08-15-2004
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
In honor of our conversation last night, today's theam will be bad 70's/80's name rip offs. To start off, hes a 77' Mustang II. |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #1 |
8-15-2004 @ 12:06:17 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I still say the Mustang II is not a rip off, it was just the Mustang going back to its roots. sure it didn't make a lot of power, but it still had a 302 in it, slap a few aftermarket goodies on (even back then) and you had one bad little car. granted this car sucks monkey balls
|
|
| #2 |
8-15-2004 @ 12:17:57 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't like the high "shoulders" of the Mustang II. There's just too much sheetmetal above the front wheel, and too much of it is flat. For a Mustang II to look truly good to me, it'd have to be lowered, and the front wheelwells would have to be re-radiused and stuff.
And why does this POS have my hood-scoop? :p
|
|
| #3 |
8-15-2004 @ 12:20:28 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
looks more like a Boss 429 scoop to me. ethier way though it sucks
|
|
| #4 |
8-15-2004 @ 12:32:46 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The mustang II was the most anemic car Ford ever built, it's a great build-up platform, but out of the box, it stunk, and this guy has ruined this one even more with the stupid "Shit sparkle" paint, and he didn't even mask off the bumper.....
|
|
| #5 |
8-15-2004 @ 12:37:57 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, but it still didn't have the weakest production 302
|
|
| #6 |
8-15-2004 @ 12:49:47 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, People wonder how the firbird managed to sell so well in 77' - 80', despite having only 185HP? There's your answer........
|
|
| #8 |
8-15-2004 @ 12:56:47 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, Thing is, just changing the heads on those motors will bump that up by 75 - 100%
It's all because they're running 7:1 compression
|
|
| #9 |
8-18-2004 @ 09:24:30 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'd sport it with some engine modifications. oh yeah and the Mustang II saved the Mustang.
|
|
| #10 |
10-21-2006 @ 06:43:42 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I've been seeing more of these lately. Could their day in the sun finally be coming?
[Edited by Adambomb on 10-21-2006 @ 06:44:11 PM]
|
|
| #11 |
10-21-2006 @ 06:46:22 PM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, with the price of 60's and 70's cars being so fucking high, yeah. Anything from that period that can be SBC'd will be
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
