Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "Toured the Charlotte Motor Speedway, ate at the Sp..."
Car: 98677   By: Skid   Comment: "I think '66 is the only year I like the Caprice ro..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the *only* team o..."
Car: 78637   By: DiRF   Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=36277
Submitted by: Lemming
Comments: 28  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 10-19-2004
View Stats Category: Off-topic
Description:
My new lower intake manifold. The end is in sight. :)


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#1
10-19-2004 @ 08:13:30 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
The "outside" sets of runners are the short runners. They're supposed to have little throttle bodies (called runner controls or IMRCs) in them, but those have been deleted for the sake of airflow. Also conspicuously absent are the EGR ports that normally protrude well into the long runners (the "inside" set). This should be a nice intake with minimal restrictions. I will lose some low-end torque due to lost velocity (IMRCs are designed to help runner velocity), but I took this into account when I chose gearing for the car.

#2
10-19-2004 @ 08:20:10 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Pizzimp.

#3
10-19-2004 @ 08:21:50 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Just waiting on the upper intake manifold (which will be a cut-and-weld job; the plenum was cut open to remove all the bolt posts and casting lumps) and somewhat excessive throttle body. Hopefully only another couple weeks, then it'll be time to fix the exhaust (chambered mufflers drone too much), put the manifolds on, and tune the thing.

#4
10-19-2004 @ 08:24:12 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
sweetness

#5
10-19-2004 @ 08:25:01 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#3, Why the "somewhat excessive" TB?

#6
10-19-2004 @ 08:25:49 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Hopefully I'll get the opportunity to do some suspension stuff before too much longer; it's picked up a bit of axle hop.

#7
10-19-2004 @ 08:27:47 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#5, 70mm, stock is 60. IMHO, it's more than I really need for an NA application. However, if I'm having an upper intake ported to match a TB of my choice, I'm going to go with one I wouldn't "outgrow" if I ever wanted to use a poweradder.

edit: Also, logically, it would seem that I'd get more throttle response with less pedal travel, which if nothing else would serve to help me forget my lack of low-end torque. :-P


[Edited by Lemming on 10-19-2004 @ 08:29:08 PM]


#8
10-19-2004 @ 08:31:39 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#7, can I have you're old one, I think mine's just a 55mm <lose>

[Edited by stang392 on 10-19-2004 @ 08:32:15 PM]


#9
10-19-2004 @ 08:32:56 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#8, You don't want my old one. It's been halfshafted and used as a porting experiment. :-P

#10
10-19-2004 @ 09:26:32 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
I've gotta do something about the exhaust soon, though. The drone at 70 mph is just insane.

#11
10-19-2004 @ 11:46:40 PM
Posted By : LordFlux Reply | Edit | Del
Looks great. Anxious to see what it puts down. Then you can go beat on some V8s.

#12
10-20-2004 @ 07:34:51 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Very slow ones, maybe. :-P

Actually, power output is similar to a stock '99-04 GT at the moment, but I've got better gearing. It might actually be quicker. :|


#13
10-20-2004 @ 07:47:10 AM
Posted By : kstagger Reply | Edit | Del
you need 6 two-barrel carbs on there.

#14
10-20-2004 @ 07:50:51 AM
Posted By : kstagger Reply | Edit | Del
#13, or 6 1-barrels... *snort*

#15
10-20-2004 @ 09:04:31 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
tee hee. http://www.moranav6racing.com/new.html

I can't imagine why I'd want to switch to a carburetor, but apparently I could. :-P That first item is a custom upper that mates to this style of lower intake manifold.


#16
10-20-2004 @ 09:08:49 AM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#15, that would be pimp :-P

#17
10-20-2004 @ 09:11:09 AM
Posted By : kstagger Reply | Edit | Del
#15, nothing wrong with a well tuned carb - but FI is better for daily driving.

I'm generally anti-FI for muscle cars because honestly, I don't know jack crap about 'em...

but I do plan to do a FI V8 someday... LT1s or LS1s are especially cool in older cars


#18
10-20-2004 @ 09:15:58 AM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#17, blah, Ford EFI is where its at :-P

and yes Carb vs FI really comes down to how the car is going to be used. thats why the Stang is staying FI but the 460 going in the Mark is getting 2 4 barrels. since its just going to be a toy I want simple yet big power


#19
10-20-2004 @ 09:21:10 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
I prefer fuel injection, partly because I know there are some things with my current setup that would make a carburetor very unfriendly for daily driving.

#20
10-20-2004 @ 09:23:59 AM
Posted By : kstagger Reply | Edit | Del
#19, I would NOT recommend a carb for a 3.8 Ford V6... unless you want to be 'different' :p

[Edited by kstagger on 10-20-2004 @ 09:24:14 AM]


Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Saturday, April 27, 2024 12:37:46 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.