|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
75 |
| Average Score |
2.25 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=37701 |
|
| Comments: 45 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 01-05-2005
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
2006 Chevy Monte Carlo, seen here in SS livery.
Same bland front end as the 2006 Impala, but appears to be only a facelift, rather than a complete body restyle.
Yeah, I think it's as bland as the Impala, but the current Monte Carlo sure ain't pretty, and this is an improvement. |
Showing page: 2 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
 |
| #21 |
1-05-2005 @ 08:47:51 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The best of my accidental inversions was 16926.
Which was made exactly two years ago today. Creepy.
|
|
| #23 |
1-06-2005 @ 11:28:46 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
it will also have a new 3.9-liter V6, that supposedly will have high hp and torque...i'm hoping for at least 250hp, but if it's pushrod (i'm sure it will be), it will probably be around 225...but i see it's still a 4-speed
[Edited by ambientFLIER on 1-06-2005 @ 11:29:46 PM]
|
|
| #24 |
1-06-2005 @ 11:35:54 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Front wheel drive? Strike one.
4spd auto? Strike two.
V8 mated to said front drive? Foul ball.
Even more bland design than the last one? Strike three.
[Edited by MxCx on 1-06-2005 @ 11:36:15 PM]
|
|
| #26 |
1-06-2005 @ 11:48:14 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#25, didnt say there was anything wrong with it, but more speeds are usually better
|
|
| #27 |
1-06-2005 @ 11:49:36 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#24, your third one is repetitive, you already gave it a strike for fwd, the engine has nothing to do with it
|
|
| #30 |
1-06-2005 @ 11:59:35 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#29, yea but a transverse V8 is wrong. I've seen supercharged V6s in FWD cars. Same with turbocharged V6s.
|
|
| #31 |
1-07-2005 @ 12:06:16 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#30, i meant that the v8 probably wont have much more torque steer than the s/c v6 that the current ss monte carlos have
|
|
| #32 |
1-07-2005 @ 12:36:31 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I classified the front drive v8 as a foul ball because its just that. They hit the ball (v8) but it went foul (fwd)
|
|
| #33 |
3-26-2005 @ 07:27:11 PM |
| Posted By : 89Rettagt |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#23, DOHC with VVT. 240 hp
and this looks much better than the current one. the headlights seem out of place however
[Edited by 89Rettagt on 3-26-2005 @ 07:28:24 PM]
|
|
| #34 |
3-26-2005 @ 07:36:07 PM |
| Posted By : Hoopd87 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
303 HP 5.3. Nice. As for it being FWD? I dont give a shit.
|
|
| #35 |
7-28-2005 @ 03:14:40 AM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Guess whose back? Guess whose back? Guess whose back? Guess whose back? Guess whose back?
Ah Nuuuah
TORQUE STEER
GM CREATED A MONSTER!
|
|
| #36 |
8-06-2005 @ 02:26:50 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#23, Yeah, because if it has pushrods you automatically have to deduct 25 horsepower.
|
|
| #37 |
8-06-2005 @ 02:29:06 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#36, pretty much...i mean, that's not really a bad thing, since torque usually goes up by the same amount, but it's true
|
|
| #38 |
1-09-2006 @ 01:18:59 AM |
| Posted By : Frank Castle |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Wrong on the DOHC part. And about the torque steer too. It appears that it's quite manageable.
But what do I know, I magazine race and never actually driven the cars that I bash and defend.
|
|
| #40 |
1-20-2007 @ 11:59:14 AM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
GANGSTER. not. I like these, but my gen feels more *charactery*. These seem too i don't know, soft?
|
Showing page: 2 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
