|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
Total Votes |
75 |
Average Score |
2.25 |
Verdict |
Not Rice
|
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=37701 |
|
Comments: 45 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 01-05-2005
|
View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
Description:
2006 Chevy Monte Carlo, seen here in SS livery.
Same bland front end as the 2006 Impala, but appears to be only a facelift, rather than a complete body restyle.
Yeah, I think it's as bland as the Impala, but the current Monte Carlo sure ain't pretty, and this is an improvement. |
Showing page: 1 of 3 [ 1 2 3 ]
|
#2 |
1-05-2005 @ 10:21:32 AM |
Posted By : kstagger |
Reply | Edit | Del |
rumors of RWD... probably won't be happening |
|
#3 |
1-05-2005 @ 10:23:25 AM |
Posted By : PA28Aviator |
Reply | Edit | Del |
this is okay, except for the way the bumber has the funky looking edge thing going on in the middle. reminds me of the cobalt |
|
#7 |
1-05-2005 @ 07:24:14 PM |
Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, wouldn't that cause a ton of torque steer, thus making accleration a chore? |
|
#8 |
1-05-2005 @ 07:25:38 PM |
Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
They would almost have to put a LSD iunder there, which would improve things significantly. |
|
#9 |
1-05-2005 @ 07:26:00 PM |
Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
our old 3.4 impala had more than enough torque to need some technique to floor it and take off. floor it, wheel left, drive. i hate to see the torque steer on this.
[Edited by Altima35se2003 on 1-05-2005 @ 07:27:23 PM] |
|
#10 |
1-05-2005 @ 08:16:52 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Damn, Monte Carlos have been getting uglier every year for as long as I can remember. One day Chevrolet is going to restyle the Monte Carlo where it actually looks good, and when it does I'm going to drop dead. |
|
#11 |
1-05-2005 @ 08:18:35 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I actually sorta like this. I can only hope that they intend to use a nice Torsen or Quaife differential in that little V8 beast, though. |
|
#13 |
1-05-2005 @ 08:21:30 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, Well, I could concede maybe it's about as attractive as the current ones. But they didn't look as good as the previous ones, which didn't look as good as their previous ones, pretty much going back to 1978.*
*Excluding the '80s models with the SS package. |
|
#14 |
1-05-2005 @ 08:22:58 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I liked the late '90s ones that looked like plain old 2-door Luminas. Of course, I also had a weird thing for the earlier Lumina Z34s from the early '90s, so your mileage may vary. :p |
|
#16 |
1-05-2005 @ 08:25:23 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15, I think it was supposed to vaguely resemble a cross between a spare tire hump and a kicktail spoiler. It was weird. |
|
#17 |
1-05-2005 @ 08:36:37 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
HAH! I always thought it was supposed to look like the kicktail spoilers they use on stockcars, but made curvy to match the lines of the car. But it really did come out looking like a spare tire hump.
EDIT: I put "dicktail". >_<
[Edited by Skid on 1-05-2005 @ 08:37:21 PM] |
|
#19 |
1-05-2005 @ 08:43:57 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#18, I don't know why, but a lot of times when I'm typing really fast my fingers end up inverting, so I make weird typos like putting "SWS" for "LOL", or sometimes whole really long words completely mirrored on the keyboard. Or as in this case, something simple like "D" instead of "K". |
Showing page: 1 of 3 [ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|