Ricecop's Rice Or Not?

Latest Comments

Car: 98677	By: Skid	Comment: "I think '66 is the only year I like the Caprice ro..."
Car: 37161	By: DiRF	Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161	By: DiRF	Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the only team o..."
Car: 78637	By: DiRF	Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost	By: DiRF	Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."

See last 25 comments

Go to
Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post

Top 10
Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad

New & Retired
Newest Images Retired Images

Other
Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats

Online Now
0 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List

This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes	53
Average Score	1.40
Verdict	Not Rice

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=41047	Submitted by: 427 Vette
Comments: 16 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View)	Submitted on: 06-06-2005
View Stats	Category: Car

Description: Ferrari 288 GTO. Full-res: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...Cars/288GTO.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...288GTOfront.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...TOfrontside.jpg

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]


#1	6-06-2005 @ 10:22:15 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Thank you.


#2	6-06-2005 @ 10:58:12 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#1, I think normal 288 looks better starts digging a foxhole :)


#3	6-06-2005 @ 11:26:13 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#2, There's a NORMAL non-GTO 288?! I am unaware of this.


#4	6-06-2005 @ 11:31:25 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette	Reply \| Edit \| Del
The only 288s I know is this one, and the 288 Evo racecar.


#5	6-06-2005 @ 11:38:13 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#4, But from what I understand, the racecar was considered a "GTO" also... shrugs shoulders


#6	6-06-2005 @ 11:38:56 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#5, Yes.


#7	6-06-2005 @ 05:52:04 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I assume he meant the 208?


#8	6-07-2005 @ 05:11:19 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#7, Uh... Yea.


#9	6-07-2005 @ 06:14:40 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#8, I used to get them confused too :)


#10	6-07-2005 @ 07:09:58 PM
Posted By : 427 Vette	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#7, I think he meant the 308.


#11	6-07-2005 @ 07:30:42 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#10, Oops. 308.


#12	6-07-2005 @ 07:41:52 PM
Posted By : Hoopd87	Reply \| Edit \| Del
328?:p


#13	6-07-2005 @ 07:46:42 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#12, 420? :P


#14	3-29-2015 @ 04:16:19 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Nope there was a 208 as well. Obviously not a GTO, though. It had a sub 2.0L V8 that produced about 150 horses in nonturbo form. The 208GTSi produced 220 horses IIRC. The 208 was replaced by the far-more-common 308 in 1986 or 1987, I can't remember which.


#15	3-29-2015 @ 12:28:43 PM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
The 208 was only sold new in Italy and New Zealand, IIRC. It was sold concurrently with the 308, and both were replaced with the 328.


#16	3-29-2015 @ 12:40:23 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#15, 208 was also sold in the US, I think, as well. Wait, nope, you're right.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]

Login to leave a comment

	Classifieds
Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Friday, April 26, 2024 07:44:26 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.