|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Showing page: 3 of 3 [ 1 2 3 ]
|
#41 |
11-26-2005 @ 05:38:26 PM |
Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#40, I agree about Bush. Never really cared for him. [/$0.02] |
|
#42 |
11-26-2005 @ 05:42:49 PM |
Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#41, One of the main reasons he won that 2000 election was because Al Gore got real cranky at the third presidential debate. It was said that Bush kept a relaxed repose and won over voters because they didn't want a stringent president, they'd rather have someone at ease with himself. Which is strange because I always thought you'd want a leader to be passionate about something, as opposed to Dingus the wonder nerd we have in office now.
Edit: Well I guess Dingus does feel passionate about Gay bashing and Medicare...
[Edited by Subourbon187 on 11-26-2005 @ 05:45:00 PM] |
|
#43 |
11-26-2005 @ 05:47:15 PM |
Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Can I get a general opinion on unions - specifically the UAW? |
|
#49 |
11-26-2005 @ 06:02:35 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Thanks.
I just couldn't get into Day After, though. I found it entirely too preachy and it had some of the most jaw-droppingly ridiculous incidental plot elements I've ever seen. |
|
#51 |
11-26-2005 @ 06:05:22 PM |
Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Day After Tommorrow was kinda good, I saw it on video a few months back. My main problem with it was imagining Dennis Quaid trekking from the North Pole to New York in a matter of hours. But, like DiRF said, I just turned my brain off and enjoyed the incoheent plot with a smile on my face and puddle of drool on my shirt.
[Edited by Subourbon187 on 11-26-2005 @ 06:06:27 PM] |
|
#53 |
11-26-2005 @ 07:01:22 PM |
Posted By : 89Rettagt |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i saw it in theatres with an ex. needless to say i dont rememeber much of the moive. :P |
Showing page: 3 of 3 [ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|