Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Now do Classical Gas!..."
Car: 98681   By: DiRF   Comment: "This must have been right around 1979, when the US..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Very nice...."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "So, I pre-odered these last August and they finall..."
Car: 98680   By: Skid   Comment: "Neat! I don't know if I've ever seen one of these ..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 224
Average Score 4.44
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=4913
Submitted by: Mad Max
Comments: 42  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 1  (View)
Submitted on: 04-26-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Slick Jack Roush-tuned Mustang.


   Comments

Showing page: 2 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]

#21
4-26-2002 @ 02:53:52 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
??? Whats up with the description then.

#22
4-26-2002 @ 02:55:36 PM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
This is not a 2003 Cobra. It is a stock Mustang with an extra $20,000 put into it. Essentially, it was Cobrafied by Jack Roush instead of Ford. This car has performance comparable to that of the 2003 Cobra, so I was arguing based on the 2003 Cobra's performance. If that makes any sense at all.

#23
4-26-2002 @ 02:57:54 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
I guess, its all good anyway. Both cars (vette cobra) have their highs and lows, plus their better than a riced out NOSS sucking import.

#24
4-26-2002 @ 02:59:40 PM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
That's the way I see it. What's the difference, exactly, between a Z06 and a normal Corvette, anyway?

#25
4-26-2002 @ 03:01:43 PM
Posted By : 4n-Sucks Reply | Edit | Del
If someone offered you a zo6 or a cobra, who would take the cobra?

#26
4-26-2002 @ 03:02:16 PM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Me.

#27
4-26-2002 @ 03:02:43 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
Better engine, better suspension, titanium Muffler, Shaved winshield, Magnesium rims, sticky tires, and some other stuff. It seems too work, 3.9 0-60 and 1.02 G's

[Edited by Jurrell on 4-26-2002 @ 03:04:14 PM]


#28
4-26-2002 @ 03:04:12 PM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Shaved windshield? Huh? And what's the difference in the engine? Just more horsepower out of the same mill, like GM likes to do? And yeah, that does seem to work.

#29
4-26-2002 @ 03:09:57 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
To hear Chevy engineers tell it, wringing 20 more horses from the aluminum V-8 was far from rocket science. They installed a larger air-cleaner, a less-restrictive mass airflow sensor, and a higher-lift camshaft to pump more air through the engine. In addition, the intake-valve stems are now hollow (for lighter weight), and the exhaust-valve stems are filled with a liquid sodium alloy to aid cooling. Finally, exhaust back pressure was reduced by the removal of the small and restrictive catalytic converters that were mounted in the exhaust manifolds. New, more effective downstream cats allow the Z06 to meet NLEV standards. Horsepower increases to 405 hp at 6000 rpm, and torque goes up 15 pound-feet to 400 at 4800 rpm.

In the quarter-mile there's an even bigger difference. The new car did it in 12.4 seconds at 116 mph, whereas the 385-hp car needed 12.7 seconds to hit 113 mph. For an only five-percent increase in power, the new Z06 certainly extracts quite a bit. For the record, both


#30
4-26-2002 @ 03:10:24 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
cars, we've tested

#31
4-26-2002 @ 03:12:55 PM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Hmm.... so basic hop-ups, applied effectively. Nothing wrong with that. Those are about the same as the numbers I've seen for the new Cobra. I'd love to have either one.

#32
4-26-2002 @ 03:17:17 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
There's more, This upgrade to the LS6 engine’s output is the result of new hollow stem valves, a higher-lift camshaft, a low restriction mass air flow (MAF) sensor and a new low restriction air cleaner design. Eliminating the PUP converter from the exhaust system enables better flow of spent gasses and reduces vehicle weight, without compromising Corvette’s NLEV (National Low Emission Vehicle) status.

Suspension Upgrades
The Z06-specific FE4 High-Performance suspension system features a larger front stabilizer bar, a stiffer rear leaf spring and specific camber settings - all calibrated for maximum control during high-speed operation. The 2002 model year Z06 also has new rear shock valving for a more controlled ride. The foundation of Corvette’s agile handling is hydroformed frame rails. Its four-wheel independent front suspension features cast aluminum upper and lower A-arms. The Z06 and models equipped with the available Z51 package now have aluminum front stabilizer bar links fo


#33
4-26-2002 @ 03:19:20 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
for the independent rear suspension.



The foundation of Corvette’s agile handling is hydroformed frame rails. Its four-wheel independent front suspension features cast aluminum upper and lower A-arms. The Z06 and models equipped with the available Z51 package now have aluminum front stabilizer bar links for lighter weight. A transverse leaf spring system is used for the independent rear suspension

Shaving the winsheilds, saved about 10 pounds, it maked the interior louder, but who dosen't like the sound of a V-8


#34
4-26-2002 @ 03:21:41 PM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Oh, so the glass is thinner to save weight. I see. Good idea. If I know car companies, though, they charge you more for less glass. Personally, I think I'd get more stoked about the suspension mods than the engine work. And a four-wheel independent front suspension? That's certainly high-tech. I mean, most cars only have two-wheel front suspensions. ;-)

#35
6-08-2002 @ 01:13:09 AM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
1.02 gs my ass. on a high-traction skidpad with slicks, maybe.

#36
6-08-2002 @ 01:17:31 AM
Posted By : Jesuz Reply | Edit | Del
smooth

#37
8-29-2002 @ 03:54:10 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
NIIIIIICE CAR!!!!!!!

http://home.earthlink.net/~esotericus/images/hit/sosa-mac5.jpg


#38
8-29-2002 @ 03:56:45 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#35, That's the same latteral acceleration rating as the Z06 Corvette.

Nice looking 'Stang, but it needs 17 inch Torque Thrusts or Cragars.


#39
8-29-2002 @ 03:56:53 PM
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del
Jurrell sounded so smart before the drugs (Post # 29,32)

#40
8-29-2002 @ 03:58:41 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
I dunno, he sounds pretty smart with them, too, if you can ever figure out what he's trying to say.

Showing page: 2 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Monday, May 6, 2024 10:07:18 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.