|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
Total Votes |
359 |
Average Score |
6.95 |
Verdict |
Rice
|
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=5679 |
|
Comments: 50 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 05-15-2002
|
View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
Description:
Nice color |
Showing page: 2 of 3 [ 1 2 3 ]
|
#21 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:26:54 PM |
Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#19 Yeah, but Camaros get that with little work, much less money, and probably much more torque. |
|
#22 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:27:14 PM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
And then you need to go start spending big money. Thats if you have any left after buying the beast. |
|
#23 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:27:50 PM |
Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
And you're talkin' boost controller. Camaros don't use turbos and make that. |
|
#24 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:28:51 PM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Thing is most arent AWD 4WS twin turbo beasts, most are RWD single turbo, (if that) automatic heaps of crap. |
|
#25 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:30:17 PM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
No camaros use 2 more cyls and more displacement. |
|
#26 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:30:21 PM |
Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Too much junk for too much money. No wonder the ricers love 'em. |
|
#27 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:30:59 PM |
Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
you can get a boost controller for about $20. Nothing fancy, just your basic springloaded ball valve. Works like a charm. Not exactly a big investment. |
|
#28 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:31:48 PM |
Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
And just sos you know, my 450 hp Eclipse o Death had one of those. $20 boost controller. |
|
#29 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:31:49 PM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
But you will need a dyno tune, if not you can lose your engine quite fast. |
|
#30 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:32:27 PM |
Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
and you need a dyno tune if you put a new camshaft in a camaro. so what? |
|
#31 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:33:14 PM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Well there we go. If you are over here Id be going skyline, they are WAY cheaper than camaros. |
|
#32 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:33:32 PM |
Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#25 Yeah, Cams, but sometimes that's just not an excuse. With all the "advanced technology" AND a turbo or two, they should be stompin' American cars. They can't even make comperable torque. |
|
#33 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:34:31 PM |
Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I wouldn't mind buying a R32. for $30k or so, in good shape, I would be all over it. and yes they can be got that cheap. |
|
#34 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:34:36 PM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Thats because they have the same problems as you lot, but they just arent allowed to produce anything more that 206kw from a car. |
|
#35 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:35:21 PM |
Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Hey tin. Stock for stock. R34 Skyline, with less torque and 50 less hp, will beat a Camaro SS by more than half a second. That's not doing too bad. |
|
#36 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:36:14 PM |
Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I still say they're over-hyped and not worth the cash. |
|
#37 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:37:42 PM |
Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
over hyped by ricers as the ULTIMATE CAR!!!!!!!!!!111111111111? Yes. Still a good and fast car? Yes. If given a choice between a Camaro SS and an R32 GT-R (actually around the same price) which would I chose? R32. Why? Faster, much more rare, and exempt from emissions laws, among others. |
|
#38 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:38:44 PM |
Posted By : TinIndian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#35, That's probably all weight, though. Camaros are too damn heavy. If my car (300-500lbs. less than a Camaro) was puttin' out Camaro style hp, I'd slap a Skyline stupid. |
|
#39 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:40:20 PM |
Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Not off the line. Keep in mind, I, and just about everyone I've met, has never seen a stock Camaro SS run 12.ANYTHING. |
|
#40 |
7-28-2002 @ 11:41:00 PM |
Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
And just for the record R33 are shit. They run 13.5s stock which still isnt bad but same engine as the R32 and the R32 is a better car. And an R33 with a 4foot wing above the roof line is STUPID, you reading this mr rice boy down the coast big double decker aluminium wing on a R33 is STUPID. |
Showing page: 2 of 3 [ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|