|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
3 |
| Average Score |
3.00 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=61562 |
|
| Comments: 29 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 03-14-2007
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Truck |
|
|
Description:
Chevy S10 |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #1 |
3-14-2007 @ 12:50:39 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't completely hate it, then again I am soft on minitrucks
|
|
| #3 |
3-14-2007 @ 12:52:37 AM |
| Posted By : Driven_out |
Reply | Edit | Del |
rims need to drop to 18 inches, and carbonfucker hood needs paint, and needs less ugly headlights, other than that, nice truck
|
|
| #5 |
3-14-2007 @ 01:06:51 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I do like the red and black combo, but overall the visual mods are far from perfect. I'd nix the hood and lights and DUB badge on the door panel.
|
|
| #8 |
3-14-2007 @ 01:17:37 AM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, :) If it's a V6, it's good enough for me, although more power is always nice. If it's a 2.2? Meh, I'll walk, thanks.
|
|
| #9 |
3-14-2007 @ 01:19:07 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, 4.3s are a pretty good base for customization, but I'd rather have the extra displacement on hand personally, and fuck 4 bangers
|
|
| #10 |
3-14-2007 @ 01:20:00 AM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, these had 2.2's?????? fuuuuuuuuuuuck!
And that wouldn't even be the 2003+ 2.2 which is quite decent. Lord, Lord! V8 swap by summar!
|
|
| #13 |
3-14-2007 @ 01:29:23 AM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, haha. It was slooooow. The only vehicle I have tried to spin the tires in but couldn't.
|
|
| #14 |
3-14-2007 @ 04:18:36 AM |
| Posted By : RyCe_MuNkIe |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I've owned two S-10's.. one was the 2.2 and my current truck is the 4.3.. the 2.2 had some spunk to it, but i the 4.3 is just so far superior :D
I want this guy's fucking wheels
|
|
| #15 |
3-14-2007 @ 11:58:40 AM |
| Posted By : Driven_out |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#14, the 4.3 is an engine made of win and <3... The torquiest V6 i've ever played with. Inline sixes are another story (300 ford Big Six ftw)
only thing I dont like about the 4.3 is its engine note, even with no cat, and just a glasspack, the exhaust note just doesnt have a bite, it sounds very humdrum, but i hear a mild cam, and true duals up their bark by quite a bit
|
|
| #16 |
3-14-2007 @ 12:06:27 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The 4.3 in my old Sonoma was a damn good engine, great on the freeway and in the city, the only problem was that it was in a battered 10 year old GM truck.
|
|
| #18 |
3-14-2007 @ 12:18:49 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
My senior year in high school I went to the highschool nationals at Milan Dragway in Milan, Michigan, there was a late 90s Blazer there that had a pretty throaty exhaust note. It didn't sound like an SBC swap or anything, I'm fairly positive it was the 4.3L, it just sounded like it.
|
|
| #19 |
3-14-2007 @ 12:34:19 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I like the 4.3 simply because of the torque. Not alot, but there is some available, unlike the 2.2s which seem to be good for mileage only
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
