Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 90068   By: Low-Tech Redneck   Comment: "Though, the mid 70's Fords did show that where the..."
Car: 90068   By: Driven_out   Comment: "this kind of reminds me of a falcon landau https:/..."
Car: 96931   By: Skid   Comment: "Aye. 270 trim level...."
Car: 90068   By: Adambomb   Comment: "yeah.....no..."
Car: 27069   By: Low-Tech Redneck   Comment: "Must.... stop....... hitting..... self..... hundr..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 3
Average Score 3.00
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=61562
Submitted by: ricerocketboy
Comments: 29  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 03-14-2007
View Stats Category: Truck
Description:
Chevy S10


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#1
3-14-2007 @ 12:50:39 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
I don't completely hate it, then again I am soft on minitrucks

#2
3-14-2007 @ 12:51:26 AM
Posted By : Altima35se2003 Reply | Edit | Del
meh

#3
3-14-2007 @ 12:52:37 AM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
rims need to drop to 18 inches, and carbonfucker hood needs paint, and needs less ugly headlights, other than that, nice truck

#4
3-14-2007 @ 12:54:42 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
at least he has a theme going.

#5
3-14-2007 @ 01:06:51 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
I do like the red and black combo, but overall the visual mods are far from perfect. I'd nix the hood and lights and DUB badge on the door panel.

#6
3-14-2007 @ 01:10:48 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#5, new wheels, roof black, nix badging, and a black grille for me.

#7
3-14-2007 @ 01:13:11 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#6, I'd put in an LS1, lowering kit and Budnik wheels >:)

#8
3-14-2007 @ 01:17:37 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#7, :) If it's a V6, it's good enough for me, although more power is always nice. If it's a 2.2? Meh, I'll walk, thanks.

#9
3-14-2007 @ 01:19:07 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#8, 4.3s are a pretty good base for customization, but I'd rather have the extra displacement on hand personally, and fuck 4 bangers

#10
3-14-2007 @ 01:20:00 AM
Posted By : Altima35se2003 Reply | Edit | Del
#8, these had 2.2's?????? fuuuuuuuuuuuck!

And that wouldn't even be the 2003+ 2.2 which is quite decent. Lord, Lord! V8 swap by summar!


#11
3-14-2007 @ 01:26:35 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#10, yes. ex's Blazer was a 2.2,

#12
3-14-2007 @ 01:28:16 AM
Posted By : Altima35se2003 Reply | Edit | Del
#11, ew

#13
3-14-2007 @ 01:29:23 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#12, haha. It was slooooow. The only vehicle I have tried to spin the tires in but couldn't.

#14
3-14-2007 @ 04:18:36 AM
Posted By : RyCe_MuNkIe Reply | Edit | Del
I've owned two S-10's.. one was the 2.2 and my current truck is the 4.3.. the 2.2 had some spunk to it, but i the 4.3 is just so far superior :D

I want this guy's fucking wheels


#15
3-14-2007 @ 11:58:40 AM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
#14, the 4.3 is an engine made of win and <3... The torquiest V6 i've ever played with. Inline sixes are another story (300 ford Big Six ftw)

only thing I dont like about the 4.3 is its engine note, even with no cat, and just a glasspack, the exhaust note just doesnt have a bite, it sounds very humdrum, but i hear a mild cam, and true duals up their bark by quite a bit


#16
3-14-2007 @ 12:06:27 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
The 4.3 in my old Sonoma was a damn good engine, great on the freeway and in the city, the only problem was that it was in a battered 10 year old GM truck.

#17
3-14-2007 @ 12:13:27 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
and this explains the crappy exhaust note
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQNRpDQb40E


#18
3-14-2007 @ 12:18:49 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
My senior year in high school I went to the highschool nationals at Milan Dragway in Milan, Michigan, there was a late 90s Blazer there that had a pretty throaty exhaust note. It didn't sound like an SBC swap or anything, I'm fairly positive it was the 4.3L, it just sounded like it.

#19
3-14-2007 @ 12:34:19 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
I like the 4.3 simply because of the torque. Not alot, but there is some available, unlike the 2.2s which seem to be good for mileage only

#20
3-14-2007 @ 01:31:25 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#19, That's pretty much all an engine about 2.0L is good for *runs*

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, September 21, 2018 05:18:49 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2018 Ricecop. All rights reserved.