Go to car

Latest Comments
Car: 96890   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "LOL holy shit...."
Car: 96890   By: Low-Tech Redneck   Comment: "Pedal to the, well, whatever that is down there......"
Car: 96890   By: DiRF   Comment: "Yabba-dabba-do ..."
Car: 95884   By: DiRF   Comment: "Ok, thank you so much. I had no idea the highway o..."
Car: 95884   By: DiRF   Comment: "Ah yes, I've driven that one... had fun finding th..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Bling Bling
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images


Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List




Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password

View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.

This image has been retired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 1021
Average Score 3.39
Verdict Not Rice

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=643
Submitted by: DiRF
Comments: 38  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 1  (View)
Submitted on: 01-18-2002
View Stats Category: Car
Just so everybody knows, this is the ORIGINAL Eleanor, from H.B. Halicki's 1974


Showing page: 1 of 2
1 2 ]

1-18-2002 @ 04:56:57 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Damn, it cut off the rest of my description...here's the rest:
1974 masterpiece "Gone In Sixty Seconds". She is a 1973 Mustang Mach 1 with no visual modifications. Her internal modifications include a roll-cage, and cement in the front fenders to help her survive her 40 minute adventure.

1-20-2002 @ 02:29:11 AM
Posted By : Geist02mds Reply | Edit | Del
WRXM'ALL had that car!

1-20-2002 @ 06:39:16 PM
Posted By : mikesrt Reply | Edit | Del
It is UGLY.

1-23-2002 @ 08:38:32 PM
Posted By : Anti-Ricer 007 Reply | Edit | Del
My dad had a 69' mach 1 and said it was pretty fast, i mean i'm not sayin it'd blow all the other cars away back then, but it had its power. he used to drag all the time on telegraph road in detroit.

1-30-2002 @ 03:01:38 PM
Posted By : Geist02mds Reply | Edit | Del
Let me guess, The BMW E46 lightweight would kick its ass. Jackass!

1-30-2002 @ 03:03:33 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
What kind of motor did this car have? I think I heard somewhere that it had a 302, but I'm probably mistaken. I know it was a 4 speed trans, though.

1-30-2002 @ 03:04:30 PM
Posted By : wrxm all Reply | Edit | Del

2-03-2002 @ 04:35:48 AM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Yeah, the original Eleanor was a 302, I -believe.- There were no big-blocks in the Mustang by this point.

2-08-2002 @ 06:45:23 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
no, they had the 427 as early as 68. the bullit mustang (the real one) was a 68 390 4-speed fastback because the 427 was only offered with an automatic at that point. BTW, '68 stang literature called the auto a "Select-Shift Cruise-O-Matic." I'm not even joking. I don't know if the energy crisis/insurance smackdown of the early seventies eliminated the larger motors from the mustang though.

2-18-2002 @ 12:58:41 PM
Posted By : 500plus Reply | Edit | Del
A 429 or 460 bolts right in to these cars. The 71 & 72's had an optional 429. They were big and heavy but with a 429 or 460 they make a decent car.

2-18-2002 @ 01:00:16 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
If you have the means, I highly recommend every true car enthusiast on this site to watch the original "Gone In Sixty Seconds". The 40-minute final car chase is the best.

2-24-2002 @ 01:18:02 AM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
actually i think it had a 351 Windsor...

2-26-2002 @ 07:55:22 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
That's what I was thinking, CRX. I heard it was a 302, but it seems like it should be a 351. BTW, wasn't it a Cleveland in '74, not a Windsor?

2-28-2002 @ 06:02:53 AM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
They stopped putting big blocks in the 'Stang after '71 due to insurance and rising oil prices. Yeah, a big-block bolts right in, but I think this was a 351C.

3-14-2002 @ 06:21:51 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
"Shoulda read my horoscope today..." SCREEECH! BAM!!!

3-16-2002 @ 09:36:12 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
Looks kinda odd.., not ulgy but odd

3-25-2002 @ 10:18:18 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
I timed it one time. This car was pristine for exactly 17 seconds...

3-25-2002 @ 10:20:05 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
On the flip side of the coin, notice how in Smokey & TB, no matter how many dirt roads Burt drives down, the Trans Am stays squeaky clean in the next shot.

3-25-2002 @ 10:22:14 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
I saw an interview with Halicki one time. He would try over and over to do whatever manuver they were working on cleanly, but if he hit something, that was the one they'd use, because they didn't want dents showing up that weren't gotten off camera. I would like to see a reproduction of that car (what kind of tires were those, anyway? Goodyear drag radials?) sitting next to the actual one, after it got beat up. sort of a before and after thing.

3-25-2002 @ 10:24:18 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Ever seen "The French Connection"? and if so, the El chase scene is a classic. THe one part where the Buick spins out into a chain link fence was not planned, the stunt driver screwed up, he was supposed to just drive by, but crashed the car, so they decided to leave the shot in.

Showing page: 1 of 2
1 2 ]

Login to leave a comment

Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Monday, July 23, 2018 09:55:13 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2018 Ricecop. All rights reserved.