Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 98677   By: Skid   Comment: "I think '66 is the only year I like the Caprice ro..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the *only* team o..."
Car: 78637   By: DiRF   Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 10
Average Score 2.30
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=64307
Submitted by: wannabemustangjockey
Comments: 11  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 06-13-2007
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Base Pontiac 6000. This one may have the crappy Iron Duke four.


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
6-13-2007 @ 04:13:57 AM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
the iron duke is a good engine in its own right, but yeah... still gutless
but I wouldnt mind an Iron duke s10 for puttin around every day


#2
6-13-2007 @ 04:23:11 PM
Posted By : Disrupture Reply | Edit | Del
I drove a base 6000 with the iron duke once.. fucking slow but not much different from the 2.8l I drove.

#3
6-13-2007 @ 04:25:13 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
#2, Like I tell people about my car ... my 2.8 isn't fast but the sport suspension (completely different from that of the standard 6K) makes up for it in the corners. :3

#4
6-13-2007 @ 04:28:37 PM
Posted By : Disrupture Reply | Edit | Del
#3, I would love to try that !

#5
6-13-2007 @ 04:58:05 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Lv9-QPg01yI
I've driven it like this a number of times. It's pretty tossable.


#6
6-13-2007 @ 09:10:48 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
My grandma had one of these, I don't recall the year but I believe it was one of the very last model years for the 6000 like this one here. It was the LE model, I'm not sure what that had under the hood but she kept it up very well and got a good price when she sold it for her Taurus. It was a great car.

#7
6-13-2007 @ 09:45:03 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
#6, The LE probably had the low-output 2.8, I'd imagine.

#8
6-13-2007 @ 09:50:41 PM
Posted By : Disrupture Reply | Edit | Del
#5, Whoa.. I drive the 850 like this every single day but yeah, for a 6k it's quite impressive.

#9
6-13-2007 @ 10:28:15 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#7, Sounds right to me.

#10
6-13-2007 @ 10:31:55 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
#9, If it was one of the last ones, it would have had blacked out quarter windows - and possibly a 3.1.

#11
6-13-2007 @ 10:51:05 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#10, I don't quite recall the year, she sold it back in 2001. But there are plenty of pictures of it, and my Grandpa's old Sonoma. Next time I'm over there I'll take a looksee and see what I can find.

[Edited by Subourbon187 on 6-13-2007 @ 10:52:47 PM]


Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, April 26, 2024 03:15:01 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.