|
|
|
|
|
This image has been retired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
948 |
| Average Score |
7.96 |
| Verdict |
Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=673 |
|
| Comments: 59 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 01-19-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
No description |
Showing page: 3 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
 |
| #41 |
2-21-2002 @ 05:12:24 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Why is it whenever someone calls an expensive car "ugly", everyone says "You're jealous!". No. I don't care how expensive this thing is, it's friggin' ugly. If you're jealous, you'd say "GAWD, I want that car." But when you say "That's ugly", it typically means you dislike it. Just to fill you in.
|
|
| #42 |
2-21-2002 @ 05:15:03 PM |
| Posted By : no1camaro |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Skid, what about when you say "it looks like sh@t!!"????
[Edited by no1camaro on 2-21-2002 @ 05:16:06 PM]
|
|
| #43 |
2-21-2002 @ 05:15:51 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Okay, that means you REALLY don't like it...
|
|
| #44 |
2-21-2002 @ 05:17:21 PM |
| Posted By : no1camaro |
Reply | Edit | Del |
tks Skid, now that I know I like to say "THIS LOOKS LIKE SH@T!!!!" and whats with the bike rack in the back?
|
|
| #45 |
2-21-2002 @ 05:19:58 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
So he can hook his bike to the back. That's how he gets it moving to those "mad tyte" quarter mile times.
|
|
| #46 |
3-08-2002 @ 07:29:07 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I've seen some NICE widebodys. There's a C5 corvette with a 6" widebody in Houston. He got the widebody AND tubbed it so he could have 12.5" tires in the back (10.5 front) without having them stick out. The reason I like it is that the widebody is barely noticable. Plus he has an all-aluminum 427, C5R style, which means about 750hp...
|
|
| #47 |
3-08-2002 @ 07:33:12 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
When I was in college, some guy on campus had a late 2nd Gen Firebird that he took the spoiler off of and put a rear bike rack on. Every time i saw it, the urge to just rip it off with my bare hands and beat the guy to death was nearly uncontrolable.
|
|
| #48 |
3-16-2002 @ 12:35:26 PM |
| Posted By : NOSsucks |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Just a thought: Before the dealer sells a nice car (I.E. Supra, RX-7, Ferrari, Lamborghini (sp?), etc...) Why don't they follow these simple steps:
1.) Make the buyer take an IQ test, if their score is lower than your average house plant, don't sell it to them.
2.) Ask if they plan to modify the car, if so, how. If it involves a wing that is a.) taller than the car itself, or b.) has more levels than a skyscraper. Don't sell them the car.
3.) If, when they bring it back for maintnance(sp?), they have done something to hidiously disfigure the car, shoot them.
I think if more dealerships followed this simple, three-step plan, more cars would be saved.
|
|
| #49 |
3-16-2002 @ 12:48:38 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
This is a chicks car, check out all the mirrors...
|
|
| #51 |
7-10-2002 @ 12:06:16 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I saw the front of this car. it has the worlds ulgiest front
|
|
| #53 |
7-10-2002 @ 12:10:49 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The front reminds me of a Civic Del Sol. With huge fenders.
|
|
| #54 |
7-10-2002 @ 12:40:10 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
So to all you people who were defending this car, saying all its mods have a purpose, how does crow taste?
|
|
| #55 |
7-10-2002 @ 12:46:07 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Another wonderful feature of riceboys... they think costing a lot is a good thing. No, cost doesn't necessarily make you faster, it just makes you poorer. As a general rule, yes, speed costs money, but the money must be spent wisely. I'll put some bucks down that my $15 - $20,000 Mustang could beat this hideous-ass thing that "cost more than my life."
|
|
| #56 |
7-10-2002 @ 01:39:12 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'd say Max's Mustang could easily beat this thing. And look a lot better in the process. Widebody kits look OK sometimes. This is not one of those times.
|
|
| #57 |
8-09-2002 @ 02:40:54 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
"How else are you supposed to get 10 inch wheels under the car?"
The same way real cars fit 10 inchers under the back. They're called mini-tubs.
|
|
| #58 |
8-09-2002 @ 02:43:13 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
This thing would look so much better with stock bodywork and minitubs.
|
|
| #59 |
9-13-2005 @ 04:20:33 PM |
| Posted By : 427 Vette |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#48, Reminds me of some idiot who asked a Lamborghini rep if "22s would fit on his Murcielago. Everyone lost all respect they had for him.
|
Showing page: 3 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
