Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 98677   By: Skid   Comment: "I think '66 is the only year I like the Caprice ro..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the *only* team o..."
Car: 78637   By: DiRF   Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 2
Average Score 3.50
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=78233
Submitted by: ricerocketboy
Comments: 10  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 04-01-2009
View Stats Category: Truck
Description:
Ford F-100


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
4-01-2009 @ 01:40:35 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Unibody, yeah! These were pretty stylish.

#2
4-01-2009 @ 01:52:57 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Guy I bought my Crapi from had a Unibody F-100.

#3
4-01-2009 @ 01:57:28 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
I coulda had this for a sum of $500 or so. Dammit.

#4
4-01-2009 @ 01:59:18 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#3, Not bad, especially considering it doesn't look too rusty. Could be the odd hole in the floorpan, but that's not too bad.

#5
4-01-2009 @ 02:09:33 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#4, it needed a new floor, and some other doodads. :( I want to buy it now, but I dunno the dude who owns it now. :(

#6
4-01-2009 @ 08:21:13 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
Whoa, unibody pickup? Like, no frame?

#7
4-01-2009 @ 08:25:40 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
#6, Like, the cab and pickup bed are one piece. Take a close look and you'll see that there's no space between them as there would be on a standard pickup with a bed mounted to the frame separately from the cab.

#8
4-01-2009 @ 08:38:49 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
#7, Oh, I see. But if I remember right there is some twisting of the frame in the pickups (viedo comparison of modern trucks actually made it look like a LOT of twisting), didn't the unibody crack?

#9
4-01-2009 @ 08:59:40 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#8, This was a big part of their controversey....they weren't considered "heavy duty" enough, which was important to most fleetside truck buyers since fleetside beds had more cargo space than stepside beds.

The "integral cab" was standard in 1961 (unless the buyer ordered a stepside) and was so rejected by buyers that it became optional for 1962 and 1963, with a separate bed for both the standard fleetside and stepside models. The integrated cab/bed trucks were marketed as "Styleside" for those years, and marketed as a light-duty, style-oriented truck. For 1964, the integral cab was dropped entirely.


#10
4-01-2009 @ 09:19:46 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
#9, Thanks.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, April 26, 2024 08:14:50 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.